analiza aiqbench
This research addresses the critical challenge of persona drift in large language models by introducing CORE, a framework that distinguishes between transient noise and genuine user preference evolution during long-term interactions. By combining uncertainty-aware belief revision with a new benchmark called PERSIST, the study offers a robust mechanism for maintaining consistent yet adaptable personalized states without overfitting to ambiguous inputs. These advances are essential for deploying reliable AI agents capable of sustaining coherent identities across extended conversational sessions.
Toward Robust Personalized Alignment for LLMs: Mitigating Persona Drift in Multi-Turn Dialogue
arXiv:2609.12373v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Persona drift remains a central challenge for personalized language models, as user profiles evolve over long interactions rather than remain permanently fixed. Models must therefore revise persistent persona states when preferences genuinely change, while avoiding updates driven by transient, ambiguous, or unresolved observations. We propose CORE, which separates turn-local evidence from persistent persona-state revision and selectively updates grounded user preferences through uncertainty-aware belief revision. We also introduce PERSIST, a held-out post-anchor benchmark for persona-state robustness under sequential interaction stress, covering ambiguity, conflict, and controlled social influence. Across ALOE, PersonaChat, and PERSIST, CORE improves personalized alignment and robustness, with complementary gains in normalized closed-slot state fidelity. Human evaluation and mechanistic controls further support explicit update control beyond stronger generation or persistent memory alone.
Abstract:Persona drift remains a central challenge for personalized language models, as user profiles evolve over long interactions rather than remain permanently fixed. Models must therefore revise persistent persona states when preferences genuinely change, while avoiding updates driven by transient, ambiguous, or unresolved observations. We propose CORE, which separates turn-local evidence from persistent persona-state revision and selectively updates grounded user preferences through uncertainty-aware belief revision. We also introduce PERSIST, a held-out post-anchor benchmark for persona-state robustness under sequential interaction stress, covering ambiguity, conflict, and controlled social influence. Across ALOE, PersonaChat, and PERSIST, CORE improves personalized alignment and robustness, with complementary gains in normalized closed-slot state fidelity. Human evaluation and mechanistic controls further support explicit update control beyond stronger generation or persistent memory alone.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.12373 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.12373v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.12373 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 216 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
How might continual learning affect safety and alignment?
LessWrong · 13 iun. 2026

Thousand-dimensional structure
AI Alignment Forum · 30 iul. 2026

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · 27 sept. 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · 13 oct. 2026