analiza aiqbench
This paper proposes "cooperative observation" as a framework where personal AI systems and users mutually negotiate data access based on trust and utility, rather than assuming broader surveillance automatically improves performance. The authors argue that the quality of an agent's internal model depends critically on this feedback loop between system actions and user consent, highlighting human-in-the-loop dynamics essential for viable personal intelligence.
Toward Personal Intelligence Through Cooperative Observation
arXiv:2608.17128v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A personal AI system needs a model of the user's goals, constraints, and ongoing commitments to plan and act on their behalf, and the quality of that model is bounded by what the system can observe. Broader observation does not by itself improve assistance because a bounded system must select and compress information for the task at hand. We argue that this observation bottleneck has a cooperative structure: the system builds a partial model of the user's changing life, the user evaluates its actions, and the user's consent and control shape what it can observe next. Useful and inspectable behavior can give users a reason to maintain or expand the observation channel, while failures can lead them to correct, narrow, revoke, or abandon it. We use the term cooperative observation for this feedback loop among usefulness, trust, and future access, and propose it as a framework for personal intelligence. We report a preliminary single-subject account from Organizm, a prototype used over six months, and outline evaluation directions for measuring how observation quality shapes personal AI.
Abstract:A personal AI system needs a model of the user's goals, constraints, and ongoing commitments to plan and act on their behalf, and the quality of that model is bounded by what the system can observe. Broader observation does not by itself improve assistance because a bounded system must select and compress information for the task at hand. We argue that this observation bottleneck has a cooperative structure: the system builds a partial model of the user's changing life, the user evaluates its actions, and the user's consent and control shape what it can observe next. Useful and inspectable behavior can give users a reason to maintain or expand the observation channel, while failures can lead them to correct, narrow, revoke, or abandon it. We use the term cooperative observation for this feedback loop among usefulness, trust, and future access, and propose it as a framework for personal intelligence. We report a preliminary single-subject account from Organizm, a prototype used over six months, and outline evaluation directions for measuring how observation quality shapes personal AI.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
arXiv:2608.17128 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.17128v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.17128 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 276 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · 12 sept. 2026

Deconfusing Corrigibility
AI Alignment Forum · 17 oct. 2026

Tariffs didn’t bring manufacturing jobs back to the US
The Verge · 27 iul. 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026