analiza aiqbench
This study critically evaluates the algorithmic fairness of machine learning models used to predict treatment retention for opioid use disorder, revealing persistent performance gaps across racial and demographic subgroups. The research demonstrates that while bias mitigation techniques can reduce these disparities, they cannot fully eliminate them without incurring trade-offs in predictive performance. These findings underscore the necessity for rigorous, subgroup-level auditing before deploying such models in clinical decision support systems to ensure equitable patient care.
Toward Fairness in Machine Learning Models for Predicting Treatment Retention and Premature Discontinuation in Medication for Opioid Use Disorder
arXiv:2609.22113v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Persistent low retention and completion rates in medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) have driven the use of machine learning (ML) models to predict retention and identify patients at risk of premature discontinuation. However, the fairness of these models across patient populations remains largely unexplored, raising concerns about their application in treatment decision support. This study systematically assesses algorithmic fairness in ML models for predicting MOUD retention and premature discontinuation and investigates the effectiveness of bias mitigation techniques. Using the cross-sectional Treatment Episode Data Set-Discharges (TEDS-D), which includes treatment episodes for individuals in the U.S. discharged between 2015 and 2019, we trained four ML models to predict premature treatment discontinuation and retention beyond 180 days among individuals receiving outpatient MOUD. We evaluated overall performance and subgroup-level error rates across patient subgroups defined by race, ethnicity, age, and sex, complemented by model explanation analyses. We further assessed bias mitigation techniques and their effects on both fairness and predictive performance. Our findings demonstrate that ML models for MOUD outcome prediction can exhibit subgroup-level performance gaps even when overall predictive performance appears acceptable and that bias mitigation can reduce, but not fully eliminate, these gaps without trade-offs. By demonstrating the importance of fairness-aware evaluation and transparent reporting of subgroup performance, this study provides practical insights for the responsible and context-sensitive use of ML models for risk stratification and care prioritization in MOUD treatment settings.
Abstract:Persistent low retention and completion rates in medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) have driven the use of machine learning (ML) models to predict retention and identify patients at risk of premature discontinuation. However, the fairness of these models across patient populations remains largely unexplored, raising concerns about their application in treatment decision support. This study systematically assesses algorithmic fairness in ML models for predicting MOUD retention and premature discontinuation and investigates the effectiveness of bias mitigation techniques. Using the cross-sectional Treatment Episode Data Set-Discharges (TEDS-D), which includes treatment episodes for individuals in the U.S. discharged between 2015 and 2019, we trained four ML models to predict premature treatment discontinuation and retention beyond 180 days among individuals receiving outpatient MOUD. We evaluated overall performance and subgroup-level error rates across patient subgroups defined by race, ethnicity, age, and sex, complemented by model explanation analyses. We further assessed bias mitigation techniques and their effects on both fairness and predictive performance. Our findings demonstrate that ML models for MOUD outcome prediction can exhibit subgroup-level performance gaps even when overall predictive performance appears acceptable and that bias mitigation can reduce, but not fully eliminate, these gaps without trade-offs. By demonstrating the importance of fairness-aware evaluation and transparent reporting of subgroup performance, this study provides practical insights for the responsible and context-sensitive use of ML models for risk stratification and care prioritization in MOUD treatment settings.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
arXiv:2609.22113 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.22113v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22113 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 327 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Podcast: The Future of AI: from Enterprise Adoption to Open Source Sovereignty
InfoQ · 25 sept. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026

AI in healthcare: applications and best practices
Databricks · 24 iul. 2026

AI Futures: Racing to Lose, A sermon
LessWrong · 28 sept. 2026