Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This research addresses critical retrieval bias in agentic AI systems operating within 6G cross-domain orchestration, demonstrating how memory architecture directly impacts service level agreements and negotiation outcomes between network agents. By quantifying bias through a new Retrieval Bias Index, the study provides a mathematical framework to reduce decision distortions by over 12 times compared to standard recency-based stores. For readers focused on the intersection of advanced networking and autonomous AI, this work offers essential insights into ensuring reliable, unbiased collective memory for next-generation network autonomy.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Toward an Unbiased Collective Memory for Efficient LLM-Based Agentic 6G Cross-Domain Management

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2509.26200v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Agentic artificial intelligence is a candidate enabler of Level-4 autonomy in sixth-generation (6G) networks, but agents reasoning over a shared memory inherit its distortions. We study cross-domain radio access network (RAN)--edge orchestration in which a RAN agent minimizing energy and an edge agent minimizing latency negotiate, validate proposals against a digital twin (DT), and share a collective memory. Such a memory is a sampling device: what agents retrieve, not what they store, determines what they do. We define the Retrieval Bias Index, a divergence between the induced retrieval law and a representative reference, decomposed along temporal, confirmation and availability axes, and show that additive retrieval scoring is an exponential tilt of the undebiased law, yielding a closed form for the failure-amplification weight and a saturation floor set by the store's own composition; a further result bounds excess service level agreement (SLA) violation additively in retrieval bias and DT mismatch. On a tandem queue for which stochastic network calculus supplies a feasible region, an oracle and a Nash bargaining reference, the operator attains a $12.7\times$ bias reduction over a recency store and the smallest distance to the bargaining solution among six memory architectures.

Abstract:Agentic artificial intelligence is a candidate enabler of Level-4 autonomy in sixth-generation (6G) networks, but agents reasoning over a shared memory inherit its distortions. We study cross-domain radio access network (RAN)--edge orchestration in which a RAN agent minimizing energy and an edge agent minimizing latency negotiate, validate proposals against a digital twin (DT), and share a collective memory. Such a memory is a sampling device: what agents retrieve, not what they store, determines what they do. We define the Retrieval Bias Index, a divergence between the induced retrieval law and a representative reference, decomposed along temporal, confirmation and availability axes, and show that additive retrieval scoring is an exponential tilt of the undebiased law, yielding a closed form for the failure-amplification weight and a saturation floor set by the store's own composition; a further result bounds excess service level agreement (SLA) violation additively in retrieval bias and DT mismatch. On a tandem queue for which stochastic network calculus supplies a feasible region, an oracle and a Nash bargaining reference, the operator attains a $12.7\times$ bias reduction over a recency store and the smallest distance to the bargaining solution among six memory architectures.

Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2509.26200 [cs.NI]

(or arXiv:2509.26200v2 [cs.NI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.26200 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 289 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe