analiza aiqbench
This study demonstrates that current general-purpose multimodal models like Google Gemini are unreliable for standalone species-level diagnosis of poultry coccidiosis without domain-specific fine-tuning and expert validation. The research highlights significant accuracy limitations and taxonomic biases when applying broad AI models to specialized medical microscopy tasks, underscoring the need for tailored solutions in agricultural pathology.
Toward AI-Assisted Poultry Coccidiosis Diagnosis: Evaluating Gemini and BiomedParse on Eimeria Microscopy Images
arXiv:2609.31679v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Coccidiosis caused by Eimeria parasites is a major economic burden in poultry production, and effective control depends on accurate species-level diagnosis. This study evaluates whether a general-purpose multimodal large language model can support such diagnosis. Google Gemini was assessed on 4,225 mi- croscopy images covering the seven fowl-infecting Eimeria species under two prompting conditions, one without candidate labels and one with a predefined class list, and was further tested for pathology-report generation, while BiomedParse was examined for parasite segmentation. Without candidate labels, the model produced broad and taxonomically inconsistent outputs. With candidate labels, overall accuracy reached only 14.9%, with a strong bias toward E. tenella at 74% and no correct classifications for E. acervulina, E. mitis and E. praecox. Generated treatment reports were coherent but unverified, and segmentation was only partial. Current multimodal models are therefore not yet reliable for standalone Eimeria diagnosis without domain-specific fine- tuning and expert validation.
Abstract:Coccidiosis caused by Eimeria parasites is a major economic burden in poultry production, and effective control depends on accurate species-level diagnosis. This study evaluates whether a general-purpose multimodal large language model can support such diagnosis. Google Gemini was assessed on 4,225 mi- croscopy images covering the seven fowl-infecting Eimeria species under two prompting conditions, one without candidate labels and one with a predefined class list, and was further tested for pathology-report generation, while BiomedParse was examined for parasite segmentation. Without candidate labels, the model produced broad and taxonomically inconsistent outputs. With candidate labels, overall accuracy reached only 14.9%, with a strong bias toward E. tenella at 74% and no correct classifications for E. acervulina, E. mitis and E. praecox. Generated treatment reports were coherent but unverified, and segmentation was only partial. Current multimodal models are therefore not yet reliable for standalone Eimeria diagnosis without domain-specific fine- tuning and expert validation.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.31679 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2609.31679v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31679 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 248 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
RareLens: Towards End-to-End Rare Disease Care via Aligning Divergent Large Language Model Reasoning
arXiv · 28 iul. 2026

Gemini 4 Argon: Built to solve your hardest problems
Google DeepMind · 13 oct. 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · 13 oct. 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026