analiza aiqbench
This arXiv preprint presents an LLM-based agent system that turns natural-language requests into topological data analysis and visualization workflows, using an orchestrator, a pre-execution verifier, and deterministic guardrails. The reported gains (over 95% success versus under 50% without guardrails, and comparisons against Claude Code and Codex) come from simulated conversations on the authors' own 100-prompt set, so they are not yet independent validation. For AI readers, the main takeaway is the design pattern of constraining LLM agents with atomic actions, verification, and failure-mode taxonomies in a specialized scientific domain.
TopoPilot: Reliable Conversational Workflow Automation for Topological Data Analysis and Visualization
arXiv:2603.25063v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent agentic systems demonstrate that large language models can generate complex codebases from natural language prompts. Despite this progress, they present reliability concerns for scientific visualization due to invalid operations, subtle errors, and failure to resolve underspecified inputs. These challenges are compounded in real-world workflows that exceed the complexity of standard benchmarks. In this work, we introduce TopoPilot, a reliable and extensible agentic framework for automating complex scientific visualization workflows. We focus on topological data analysis and visualization as a primary use case, while designing the framework to generalize to broader visualization domains. TopoPilot employs a two-agent architecture: an orchestrator translates user prompts into workflows composed of atomic backend actions, while a verifier evaluates workflows prior to execution. Its modular design isolates components and supports new topological descriptors and domain-specific workflows without modifying the core system. It also employs numerous deterministic guardrails to ensure semantic consistency and accurate execution. To systematically improve reliability, we develop a taxonomy of failure modes and employ targeted safeguards for each class of error. Across 1,000 simulated multi-turn conversations spanning 100 prompts, including adversarial and infeasible requests, TopoPilot achieves a success rate exceeding 95%, compared with under 50% for a baseline without comprehensive guardrails and verification. We also show that TopoPilot outperforms Claude Code and Codex on similar prompts in terms of accuracy, completion time, and token usage.
Abstract:Recent agentic systems demonstrate that large language models can generate complex codebases from natural language prompts. Despite this progress, they present reliability concerns for scientific visualization due to invalid operations, subtle errors, and failure to resolve underspecified inputs. These challenges are compounded in real-world workflows that exceed the complexity of standard benchmarks. In this work, we introduce TopoPilot, a reliable and extensible agentic framework for automating complex scientific visualization workflows. We focus on topological data analysis and visualization as a primary use case, while designing the framework to generalize to broader visualization domains. TopoPilot employs a two-agent architecture: an orchestrator translates user prompts into workflows composed of atomic backend actions, while a verifier evaluates workflows prior to execution. Its modular design isolates components and supports new topological descriptors and domain-specific workflows without modifying the core system. It also employs numerous deterministic guardrails to ensure semantic consistency and accurate execution. To systematically improve reliability, we develop a taxonomy of failure modes and employ targeted safeguards for each class of error. Across 1,000 simulated multi-turn conversations spanning 100 prompts, including adversarial and infeasible requests, TopoPilot achieves a success rate exceeding 95%, compared with under 50% for a baseline without comprehensive guardrails and verification. We also show that TopoPilot outperforms Claude Code and Codex on similar prompts in terms of accuracy, completion time, and token usage.
Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Graphics (cs.GR); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2603.25063 [cs.HC]
(or arXiv:2603.25063v2 [cs.HC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25063 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 323 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 18 sept. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 7 iun. 2026

What is AIOps?
Databricks · 17 sept. 2026

A Candid Abacus AI Review: The All-in-One AI Platform for Professionals & Enterprises
KDnuggets · 10 sept. 2026