analiza aiqbench
This research identifies a critical vulnerability in speech deepfake detectors where dynamic emotion shifts within a single utterance can significantly degrade detection accuracy, increasing spoof miss rates by over 25%. The study establishes EmoShift as a necessary benchmark to evaluate how current systems handle emotional trajectories rather than just static acoustic features. These findings highlight an urgent need for detector architectures that are robust against expressive prosody changes to maintain security in real-world scenarios.
Too Emotional to Be Fake? Intra-Utterance Emotion Shifts Expose Failure Modes in Speech Deepfake Detectors
arXiv:2610.22832v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Expressive speech synthesis can now change emotion within a single utterance, yet its impact on deepfake detection remains unclear. We introduce EmoShift, a benchmark comparing emotion-stable (AA) and emotion-changing (AB) speech to examine these effects while accounting for static emotion identity and acoustic confounds. It comprises 7,240 bona fide utterances from four source datasets and 9,720 synthetic utterances generated using four expressive TTS systems. Across seven detectors, we find that emotion changes can make synthetic speech appear more genuine, increasing spoof miss rates by up to 25.3 percentage points on OMG-Emotion at fixed thresholds. Conversely, emotion-changing bona fide speech increases false-alarm rates by up to 24.4 percentage points on IEMOCAP. Further analyses reveal detector-specific sensitivities to emotion trajectories, not fully explained by static emotion identity or splicing artifacts. These findings underscore the importance of emotion dynamics in deepfake detection.
Title:Too Emotional to Be Fake? Intra-Utterance Emotion Shifts Expose Failure Modes in Speech Deepfake Detectors
Abstract:Expressive speech synthesis can now change emotion within a single utterance, yet its impact on deepfake detection remains unclear. We introduce EmoShift, a benchmark comparing emotion-stable (AA) and emotion-changing (AB) speech to examine these effects while accounting for static emotion identity and acoustic confounds. It comprises 7,240 bona fide utterances from four source datasets and 9,720 synthetic utterances generated using four expressive TTS systems. Across seven detectors, we find that emotion changes can make synthetic speech appear more genuine, increasing spoof miss rates by up to 25.3 percentage points on OMG-Emotion at fixed thresholds. Conversely, emotion-changing bona fide speech increases false-alarm rates by up to 24.4 percentage points on IEMOCAP. Further analyses reveal detector-specific sensitivities to emotion trajectories, not fully explained by static emotion identity or splicing artifacts. These findings underscore the importance of emotion dynamics in deepfake detection.
Preprint. Under review
Sound (cs.SD); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.22832 [cs.SD]
(or arXiv:2610.22832v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.22832 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 254 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

LiveLaw Supreme Court Half-Yearly Digest: January - June 2026 [Part 2]
livelaw.in · 13 sept. 2026

Building Blocks for Foundation Model Training and Inference on AWS
Hugging Face · 11 mai 2026
If This Were a Test, How Much Would It Cost?
LessWrong · 16 iun. 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · 3 aug. 2026