analiza aiqbench
TokenPB proposes a way for a vision-language-action robot policy to pick the best of several sampled action chunks using its own language-model token probabilities, avoiding a separate verifier model. The reported gains are self-reported: +2.7 points in simulation, +17.1 in real-world tests, and +16.4 under distribution shift, with the strongest claim being a win over external-verifier baselines at the same sampling budget. Readers should check how much the approach costs in latency at M candidates and whether the gains hold across independent benchmarks and robot platforms.
TokenPB: Enabling VLA Action Self-Verification via VLM Token Probability Bucketing
arXiv:2603.18091v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Test-time sampling can improve Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies, but only if the model can efficiently select a good action from multiple candidates. Prior work often relies on separately trained external verifiers, adding extra models and inference overhead. We propose \textbf{Token Probability Bucketing (TokenPB)}, a self-verification approach that discretizes continuous action chunks into bucket tokens and co-trains a single VLA checkpoint with a joint objective: a flow-matching loss for action generation and an auxiliary bucket loss $\mathcal{L}_{\text{bucket}}$ that teaches the VLM backbone to model observation-conditioned distributions over bucket-token sequences. At inference, TokenPB samples $M$ candidates, scores each via teacher-forced evaluation under the learned distribution, and selects the best---enabling efficient batched scoring with observation-prefix KV-cache reuse. We provide theory connecting the training objective to a monotonic ranking property and bounds on expected selection regret that separate candidate-set effects from calibration. Across multiple backbones and benchmarks, TokenPB yields consistent success-rate improvements over single-sample inference from the same checkpoint (+2.7 in simulation, +17.1 in real-world, +16.4 under out-of-distribution shifts), and further improves over external-verifier baselines under the same sampling budget. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/RUCKBReasoning/TokenPB.
Abstract:Test-time sampling can improve Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies, but only if the model can efficiently select a good action from multiple candidates. Prior work often relies on separately trained external verifiers, adding extra models and inference overhead. We propose \textbf{Token Probability Bucketing (TokenPB)}, a self-verification approach that discretizes continuous action chunks into bucket tokens and co-trains a single VLA checkpoint with a joint objective: a flow-matching loss for action generation and an auxiliary bucket loss $\mathcal{L}_{\text{bucket}}$ that teaches the VLM backbone to model observation-conditioned distributions over bucket-token sequences. At inference, TokenPB samples $M$ candidates, scores each via teacher-forced evaluation under the learned distribution, and selects the best---enabling efficient batched scoring with observation-prefix KV-cache reuse. We provide theory connecting the training objective to a monotonic ranking property and bounds on expected selection regret that separate candidate-set effects from calibration. Across multiple backbones and benchmarks, TokenPB yields consistent success-rate improvements over single-sample inference from the same checkpoint (+2.7 in simulation, +17.1 in real-world, +16.4 under out-of-distribution shifts), and further improves over external-verifier baselines under the same sampling budget. The code is publicly available at this https URL.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2603.18091 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.18091v2 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.18091 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 281 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Coverage-driven alignment - What ‘Teaching Claude Why’ can borrow from AV verification
LessWrong · 8 iun. 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · 12 iun. 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026

Microsoft’s AI chief says superintelligence is near, but won’t take your job
The Verge · 8 iun. 2026