analiza aiqbench
This study introduces the first large-scale benchmark for Bangla idioms, revealing significant performance gaps among current LLMs in handling low-resource language nuances. The findings highlight that no single model dominates across paraphrasing, span detection, and meaning identification tasks, underscoring the need for specialized training to improve cultural comprehension in non-English contexts.
To What Extent Do Large Language Models Understand Bangla Idioms?
arXiv:2609.03410v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Idiomatic expressions are an integral part of natural language, reflecting cultural nuances and posing unique challenges for computational models, particularly in low-resource languages. In this paper, we present the first large-scale benchmark dataset of Bangla idioms, complemented by a synthetic multiple-choice question (MCQ) dataset for idiom meaning identification. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of recent large language models (LLMs) across three idiom-related tasks: paraphrasing, idiom span detection, and meaning identification, leveraging zero-shot and few-shot prompting strategies. Our results reveal substantial variability in model performance, with no single LLM consistently outperforming others across all tasks. Notably, Phi-4-mini-instruct excels in paraphrasing, Kimi-K2-32b-instruct in span detection, and Gemini-2.5-flash in meaning identification. We believe that our datasets and analyses will provide valuable resources to guide future research in improving LLM comprehension of idiomatic expressions, particularly in Bangla and other low-resource languages.
Title:To What Extent Do Large Language Models Understand Bangla Idioms?
Abstract:Idiomatic expressions are an integral part of natural language, reflecting cultural nuances and posing unique challenges for computational models, particularly in low-resource languages. In this paper, we present the first large-scale benchmark dataset of Bangla idioms, complemented by a synthetic multiple-choice question (MCQ) dataset for idiom meaning identification. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of recent large language models (LLMs) across three idiom-related tasks: paraphrasing, idiom span detection, and meaning identification, leveraging zero-shot and few-shot prompting strategies. Our results reveal substantial variability in model performance, with no single LLM consistently outperforming others across all tasks. Notably, Phi-4-mini-instruct excels in paraphrasing, Kimi-K2-32b-instruct in span detection, and Gemini-2.5-flash in meaning identification. We believe that our datasets and analyses will provide valuable resources to guide future research in improving LLM comprehension of idiomatic expressions, particularly in Bangla and other low-resource languages.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.03410 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.03410v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.03410 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 242 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · 23 sept. 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · 13 oct. 2026
IdiomX A Multilingual Benchmark for Idiom Understanding, Retrieval, and Interpretation
arXiv · 3 iun. 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026