Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This paper exposes a critical proof error in widely cited time-uniform concentration inequalities for discounted least-squares estimators, demonstrating that the claimed bounded radius is crossed with probability one under specific non-stationary conditions. The authors provide corrected finite- and infinite-horizon bounds and establish necessary growth orders for valid anytime boundaries, directly impacting the theoretical foundations of bandit and reinforcement learning algorithms.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Time-Uniform Self-Normalized Concentration for Discounted Least Squares: Limits and Corrections

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2608.19643v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-normalized concentration inequalities are standard tools in bandit and reinforcement-learning analyses. A widely used weighted extension claims an analogous time-uniform guarantee for discounted least-squares estimators in non-stationary problems. A simple scalar Gaussian counterexample with a fixed parameter shows that the claimed bounded radius is crossed with probability one. For fixed discount and regularization parameters, we further show that, when $\delta\leq1/2$ and $T/\delta$ is sufficiently large, any deterministic anytime boundary valid uniformly over the stated conditionally sub-Gaussian model class must be at least of order $R\sqrt{\log(T/\delta)}$ at some time by horizon $T$; for nondecreasing boundaries, this order is required at time $T$. We identify the proof error: different terminal times use different Gaussian mixing distributions, so the fixed-time mixtures do not form one supermartingale, and the stopping-time argument does not repair this failure. Finally, we show that the weighted inequality remains valid at each fixed deterministic time, give valid finite- and infinite-horizon corrections, and discuss consequences for downstream analyses.

Abstract:Self-normalized concentration inequalities are standard tools in bandit and reinforcement-learning analyses. A widely used weighted extension claims an analogous time-uniform guarantee for discounted least-squares estimators in non-stationary problems. A simple scalar Gaussian counterexample with a fixed parameter shows that the claimed bounded radius is crossed with probability one. For fixed discount and regularization parameters, we further show that, when $\delta\leq1/2$ and $T/\delta$ is sufficiently large, any deterministic anytime boundary valid uniformly over the stated conditionally sub-Gaussian model class must be at least of order $R\sqrt{\log(T/\delta)}$ at some time by horizon $T$; for nondecreasing boundaries, this order is required at time $T$. We identify the proof error: different terminal times use different Gaussian mixing distributions, so the fixed-time mixtures do not form one supermartingale, and the stopping-time argument does not repair this failure. Finally, we show that the weighted inequality remains valid at each fixed deterministic time, give valid finite- and infinite-horizon corrections, and discuss consequences for downstream analyses.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2608.19643 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.19643v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19643 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 255 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe