analiza aiqbench
This research demonstrates that time-incremental continued pretraining effectively updates LLMs with recent knowledge while avoiding catastrophic forgetting, challenging the assumption that disjoint data streams are necessary for continual learning. The study reveals that data quality outweighs quantity and that low-rank adaptation methods like LoRA can match full fine-tuning performance in this specific regime. These findings offer a practical, cost-efficient pathway for maintaining model currency without prohibitive retraining expenses.
Time-Incremental Continued Pretraining of LLMs: Knowledge Updates Without Catastrophic Forgetting
arXiv:2609.23916v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) drift out of date the moment their pretraining ends, yet retraining from scratch is prohibitively expensive. Continued pretraining (CPT) is the natural remedy, but it is typically evaluated through a continual learning lens that assumes disjoint data streams. This is a poor fit for time-incremental updates on web-scale crawls, where successive snapshots share substantial URL overlap by design. We study time-incremental CPT in this realistic regime: continued pretraining on FineWeb-Edu dumps drawn strictly from after each model's knowledge cutoff, evaluated across six open-weight models spanning three families (OLMo2, Llama-3.1/3.2, Gemma-3-1B) and four parameter scales (1B-3B-7B-8B). We organize our findings around four practical questions. (i) Is knowledge acquired? Yes, but heterogeneously, and without catastrophic forgetting: five of six models also improve on pre-cutoff factual recall, and the gains track pretraining saturation (driven primarily by token budget per parameter). (ii) What does it cost? Almost nothing: the macro-average across a thirteen-task suite stays within 0.01 of the base for every model. (iii) What is the recipe? Data quality dominates quantity (a curated 6B-token slice matches a broader 40B one); the optima for knowledge acquisition and general capability are separated by roughly an order of magnitude in learning rate; and LoRA at sufficient rank matches full CPT. (iv) Does it survive deployment? CPT gains transfer through SFT, while DPO's effect is family-dependent. Together, these results paint a more optimistic picture of time-incremental CPT than the prior continual learning literature suggests.
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) drift out of date the moment their pretraining ends, yet retraining from scratch is prohibitively expensive. Continued pretraining (CPT) is the natural remedy, but it is typically evaluated through a continual learning lens that assumes disjoint data streams. This is a poor fit for time-incremental updates on web-scale crawls, where successive snapshots share substantial URL overlap by design. We study time-incremental CPT in this realistic regime: continued pretraining on FineWeb-Edu dumps drawn strictly from after each model's knowledge cutoff, evaluated across six open-weight models spanning three families (OLMo2, Llama-3.1/3.2, Gemma-3-1B) and four parameter scales (1B-3B-7B-8B). We organize our findings around four practical questions. (i) Is knowledge acquired? Yes, but heterogeneously, and without catastrophic forgetting: five of six models also improve on pre-cutoff factual recall, and the gains track pretraining saturation (driven primarily by token budget per parameter). (ii) What does it cost? Almost nothing: the macro-average across a thirteen-task suite stays within 0.01 of the base for every model. (iii) What is the recipe? Data quality dominates quantity (a curated 6B-token slice matches a broader 40B one); the optima for knowledge acquisition and general capability are separated by roughly an order of magnitude in learning rate; and LoRA at sufficient rank matches full CPT. (iv) Does it survive deployment? CPT gains transfer through SFT, while DPO's effect is family-dependent. Together, these results paint a more optimistic picture of time-incremental CPT than the prior continual learning literature suggests.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.23916 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.23916v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.23916 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 336 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · 5 oct. 2026
How might continual learning affect safety and alignment?
LessWrong · 13 iun. 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · 12 iun. 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026