analiza aiqbench
This research refines the theoretical understanding of gradient descent dynamics in separable logistic regression, specifically addressing the "Edge of Stability" phase where loss oscillations precede convergence. By disproving a previous conjecture regarding stepsize independence, the authors establish a tighter bound dependent on dimension and sample size, offering crucial insights for optimizing large-step training regimes.
Tight Transition Time Bounds for Separable Logistic Regression at the Edge of Stability
arXiv:2610.01459v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study logistic regression on linearly separable data under gradient descent with a large constant stepsize $\eta$. Such dynamics may exhibit a characteristic Edge of Stability phenomenon, in which the loss initially oscillates before transitioning to a stable phase of monotone decrease. Existing work provides a tight $\Theta(1)$ bound in dimension $d=2$ as $\eta \to \infty$ and conjectures a bound independent of $\eta$ in arbitrary dimensions $d\geq 2$. In this paper, we disprove this conjecture by showing that, for every fixed sample size $n\geq 2$ and sufficiently small margin $\gamma$, the worst-case transition time is $$\Theta\!\left((\log\eta)^{\min\{n-2,d-2\}}\right)$$ uniformly over $d\geq2$. The key challenge in establishing a tight bound is that the sample contributing most strongly to the gradient can change repeatedly across iterations. To address this issue, we control such changes by induction on dimension and sample size, and construct matching hard instances.
Abstract:We study logistic regression on linearly separable data under gradient descent with a large constant stepsize $\eta$. Such dynamics may exhibit a characteristic Edge of Stability phenomenon, in which the loss initially oscillates before transitioning to a stable phase of monotone decrease. Existing work provides a tight $\Theta(1)$ bound in dimension $d=2$ as $\eta \to \infty$ and conjectures a bound independent of $\eta$ in arbitrary dimensions $d\geq 2$. In this paper, we disprove this conjecture by showing that, for every fixed sample size $n\geq 2$ and sufficiently small margin $\gamma$, the worst-case transition time is $$\Theta\!\left((\log\eta)^{\min\{n-2,d-2\}}\right)$$ uniformly over $d\geq2$. The key challenge in establishing a tight bound is that the sample contributing most strongly to the gradient can change repeatedly across iterations. To address this issue, we control such changes by induction on dimension and sample size, and construct matching hard instances.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2610.01459 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.01459v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.01459 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 239 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Tight Bounds for Logistic Regression with Large Stepsize Gradient Descent in Low Dimension
arXiv · 16 iun. 2026

The Machines that Make the Machines
NVIDIA · 7 oct. 2026

Why Orbital Data Centers Are Harder Than Silicon Valley Thinks
IEEE Spectrum · 11 iun. 2026
Improved Convergence of Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Logistic Regression
arXiv · 6 oct. 2026