analiza aiqbench
ThinkFuse introduces a training-free framework that improves small reasoning models by selectively fusing auxiliary paths when local uncertainty signals indicate an erroneous trajectory. By comparing segment-level shifts with broader trend data, the method avoids reinforcing unstable reasoning while reducing token generation costs on mathematical and knowledge-intensive benchmarks. This approach directly addresses the fragility of chain-of-thought generation in smaller models without requiring additional training.
ThinkFuse: Trajectory-Aware Test-Time Fusion for Small Reasoning Models
arXiv:2610.07803v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Small reasoning models (SRMs) have shown strong performance on complex reasoning tasks by generating extended chain-of-thought trajectories, but they often fail to recover once their reasoning enters an erroneous path. Existing test-time fusion methods rely on local fusion signals to determine when to trigger fusion, which can be misled by transient uncertainty fluctuations and may reinforce unstable reasoning trajectories. We propose ThinkFuse, a training-free test-time fusion framework that selectively intervenes in unreliable reasoning segments. ThinkFuse compares segment-level uncertainty shifts with trajectory-level uncertainty trends to identify unstable reasoning points and fuse auxiliary reasoning paths into the primary model's trajectory. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ThinkFuse outperforms baselines on mathematical and knowledge-intensive reasoning benchmarks, with consistent gains across model-family combinations, and remains robust with a smaller primary model. Our analysis shows that ThinkFuse requires fewer fusion triggers and generates fewer tokens, highlighting the efficiency of selective triggering. Our code is available at https://github.com/js-lee-AI/ThinkFuse.
Abstract:Small reasoning models (SRMs) have shown strong performance on complex reasoning tasks by generating extended chain-of-thought trajectories, but they often fail to recover once their reasoning enters an erroneous path. Existing test-time fusion methods rely on local fusion signals to determine when to trigger fusion, which can be misled by transient uncertainty fluctuations and may reinforce unstable reasoning trajectories. We propose ThinkFuse, a training-free test-time fusion framework that selectively intervenes in unreliable reasoning segments. ThinkFuse compares segment-level uncertainty shifts with trajectory-level uncertainty trends to identify unstable reasoning points and fuse auxiliary reasoning paths into the primary model's trajectory. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ThinkFuse outperforms baselines on mathematical and knowledge-intensive reasoning benchmarks, with consistent gains across model-family combinations, and remains robust with a smaller primary model. Our analysis shows that ThinkFuse requires fewer fusion triggers and generates fewer tokens, highlighting the efficiency of selective triggering. Our code is available at this https URL.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.07803 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.07803v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.07803 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 250 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · 26 aug. 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · 5 oct. 2026
Problems of Proliferation
LessWrong · 29 sept. 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · 21 iul. 2026