analiza aiqbench
This research introduces LCA, a novel framework for process reward modeling that addresses the credit assignment problem by attributing final outcomes to specific reasoning steps based on a "weakest link" principle. By formulating the task as a multiple instance learning problem with Softmax-Weighted-Sum pooling, the method achieves superior performance in enhancing large language model reasoning without requiring expensive stepwise annotations. The approach establishes theoretical consistency and demonstrates state-of-the-art results across various tasks, offering a scalable path for fine-grained feedback in AI systems.
The Weakest Link Tells It All: Outcome-Supervised Process Reward Modeling via Learnable Credit Assignment
arXiv:2606.27739v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Process reward models (PRMs) enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by providing fine-grained feedback, yet training PRMs typically requires expensive stepwise annotations. Outcome-supervised PRMs offer a scalable alternative by learning from final-answer correctness alone, but this introduces a fundamental credit assignment challenge, i.e., attributing outcomes to responsible reasoning steps. Existing approaches rely on either uniform or causal assignment, both of which fail to anchor credit in step correctness and thus hinder process error identification. In this work, we propose Outcome-Supervised Process Reward Modeling via Learnable Credit Assignment (LCA), an outcome-supervised PRM framework that jointly learns credit assignment and reward modeling under the principle of Weakest Link Assignment: a reasoning chain is as strong as its weakest link. To address mutual dependence between credit assignment and reward modeling, we formalize outcome-supervised PRM as a Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) problem and introduce Softmax-Weighted-Sum (SWS) pooling, an MIL pooling technique tailored for strong dependence and redundancy among reasoning states. We establish instance-level Bayes consistency of the resulting learning objective under mild assumptions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LCA outperforms state-of-the-art outcome-supervised PRMs across multiple tasks and backbones. Code is available at https://github.com/JiaTianyu20031016/MIL.git.
Abstract:Process reward models (PRMs) enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by providing fine-grained feedback, yet training PRMs typically requires expensive stepwise annotations. Outcome-supervised PRMs offer a scalable alternative by learning from final-answer correctness alone, but this introduces a fundamental credit assignment challenge, i.e., attributing outcomes to responsible reasoning steps. Existing approaches rely on either uniform or causal assignment, both of which fail to anchor credit in step correctness and thus hinder process error identification. In this work, we propose Outcome-Supervised Process Reward Modeling via Learnable Credit Assignment (LCA), an outcome-supervised PRM framework that jointly learns credit assignment and reward modeling under the principle of Weakest Link Assignment: a reasoning chain is as strong as its weakest link. To address mutual dependence between credit assignment and reward modeling, we formalize outcome-supervised PRM as a Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) problem and introduce Softmax-Weighted-Sum (SWS) pooling, an MIL pooling technique tailored for strong dependence and redundancy among reasoning states. We establish instance-level Bayes consistency of the resulting learning objective under mild assumptions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LCA outperforms state-of-the-art outcome-supervised PRMs across multiple tasks and backbones. Code is available at this https URL.
Accepted to EMNLP 2026 (Oral). Camera-ready version. Code: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.27739 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.27739v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.27739 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 296 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026

Presentation: The Five Stages of AI Maturity in Engineering Organizations - Where and Why Teams Get Stuck
InfoQ · 4 aug. 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · 5 oct. 2026

Koopman Theory and Metaethics
LessWrong · 19 sept. 2026