analiza aiqbench
This research introduces the Synthetic Web Benchmark, a procedurally generated environment designed to test how language agents react when exposed to adversarial ranking and misinformation. The study reveals catastrophic failures in frontier models where accuracy collapses even with access to truthful sources, highlighting severe miscalibration issues that current mitigation strategies fail to address. These findings provide a critical baseline for developing search-robust AI systems capable of resisting manipulation in high-stakes applications.
The Synthetic Web: Adversarially-Curated Mini-Internets for Diagnosing Epistemic Weaknesses of Language Agents
arXiv:2603.00801v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Language agents increasingly act as web-enabled systems that search, browse, and synthesize information from diverse sources. However, these sources can include unreliable or adversarial content, and the robustness of agents to adversarial ranking - where misleading information appears prominently in search results - remains poorly understood. Existing benchmarks evaluate functional navigation or static factuality but cannot causally isolate this vulnerability, and current mitigation strategies for retrieval-augmented generation remain largely untested under such conditions. We introduce Synthetic Web Benchmark, a procedurally generated environment comprising thousands of hyperlinked articles with ground-truth labels for credibility and factuality, process-level interaction traces, and contamination filtering to eliminate training-data leakage. By injecting a single high-plausibility misinformation article into a controllable search rank, we measure the causal effect of adversarial exposure in six frontier models. The results reveal catastrophic failures: accuracy collapses despite unlimited access to truthful sources, with minimal search escalation and severe miscalibration. These findings expose fundamental limitations in how current frontier models handle conflicting information, with immediate implications for deployment in high-stakes domains. Our benchmark enables systematic analysis of these failure modes and provides a controlled testbed for evaluating mitigation strategies under adversarial ranking - a gap in current research. This work establishes a reproducible baseline for developing search-robust and epistemically humble agents capable of resisting manipulation in high-stakes domains.
Abstract:Language agents increasingly act as web-enabled systems that search, browse, and synthesize information from diverse sources. However, these sources can include unreliable or adversarial content, and the robustness of agents to adversarial ranking - where misleading information appears prominently in search results - remains poorly understood. Existing benchmarks evaluate functional navigation or static factuality but cannot causally isolate this vulnerability, and current mitigation strategies for retrieval-augmented generation remain largely untested under such conditions. We introduce Synthetic Web Benchmark, a procedurally generated environment comprising thousands of hyperlinked articles with ground-truth labels for credibility and factuality, process-level interaction traces, and contamination filtering to eliminate training-data leakage. By injecting a single high-plausibility misinformation article into a controllable search rank, we measure the causal effect of adversarial exposure in six frontier models. The results reveal catastrophic failures: accuracy collapses despite unlimited access to truthful sources, with minimal search escalation and severe miscalibration. These findings expose fundamental limitations in how current frontier models handle conflicting information, with immediate implications for deployment in high-stakes domains. Our benchmark enables systematic analysis of these failure modes and provides a controlled testbed for evaluating mitigation strategies under adversarial ranking - a gap in current research. This work establishes a reproducible baseline for developing search-robust and epistemically humble agents capable of resisting manipulation in high-stakes domains.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
arXiv:2603.00801 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.00801v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.00801 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 311 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · 5 oct. 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · 13 oct. 2026

Implementing and Evaluating a Basic Per-Action Monitor for Safer Evals
METR · 27 sept. 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026