Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This research quantifies the theoretical performance penalty, or "sequential price," incurred by continual learning models when updating tasks sequentially rather than jointly. The authors demonstrate that this cost arises from recency bias and can be partially mitigated by regularization techniques like Elastic Weight Consolidation (EWC), providing a rigorous mathematical framework for understanding distribution-level forgetting in overparameterized linear regression.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, SiliconANGLE
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

The Sequential Price of Continual Learning

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.29674v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sequential task updates are fundamental to continual learning, but their recency bias can impose a lasting performance cost. We study this cost in an overparameterized linear-regression model with i.i.d. task sampling. We prove that distribution-level forgetting and population loss converge to the same stationary limit. This common limit separates exactly into the intrinsic loss asymptotically attained by joint training and an additional sequential price, and in more homogeneous task geometries the two terms coincide, making the total loss twice that of joint training. We further analyze fixed-strength elastic weight consolidation (EWC) under general task curvatures and characterize its stationary sequential price at every regularization strength. Under strong regularization, the price decays inversely with EWC strength while convergence to stationarity slows at the same scale. On the Jester joke-rating dataset, the theory exactly quantifies both the sequential price generated by naturally conflicting user preferences and its reduction by EWC.

Abstract:Sequential task updates are fundamental to continual learning, but their recency bias can impose a lasting performance cost. We study this cost in an overparameterized linear-regression model with i.i.d. task sampling. We prove that distribution-level forgetting and population loss converge to the same stationary limit. This common limit separates exactly into the intrinsic loss asymptotically attained by joint training and an additional sequential price, and in more homogeneous task geometries the two terms coincide, making the total loss twice that of joint training. We further analyze fixed-strength elastic weight consolidation (EWC) under general task curvatures and characterize its stationary sequential price at every regularization strength. Under strong regularization, the price decays inversely with EWC strength while convergence to stationarity slows at the same scale. On the Jester joke-rating dataset, the theory exactly quantifies both the sequential price generated by naturally conflicting user preferences and its reduction by EWC.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.29674 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.29674v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29674 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 245 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe