The Scissors Effect: When Resize-Based Input Diversity Helps or Hurts Transfer Attacks

arXiv:2606.22516v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Input Diversity (DI), a random resize and pad applied at each attack iteration, is a near-default ingredient of transfer-based attacks, widely assumed to improve transferability. We show this assumption is regime-dependent and, for adversarially trained surrogates, often reversed. Holding the attack fixed and varying only the surrogate, raising the DI probability improves transfer from standard surrogates but degrades it from robust ones: the two response curves separate like a pair of scissors, a pattern we call the Scissors Effect. On ImageNet, blind DI costs a robust source 10.3 percentage points of attack success across four architecturally diverse targets; the effect is several times smaller at 32x32. Direct measurement supports a bias-variance account: DI displaces the gradient by a comparable amount on both groups but reduces its variance only where the gradient is noisy, and robust surrogates have little noise left to average away. A gradient-consistency probe, frozen and hashed before the runs, predicts the sign of the effect on seven unseen surrogates, and we report where it fails alongside where it works. The practical consequence holds independently of the mechanism: leaving DI enabled by default understates the attack a robust surrogate can mount, and so overstates the robustness of the model being evaluated. Code: https://github.com/Avalon-S/ScissorsEffect.

Abstract:Input Diversity (DI), a random resize and pad applied at each attack iteration, is a near-default ingredient of transfer-based attacks, widely assumed to improve transferability. We show this assumption is regime-dependent and, for adversarially trained surrogates, often reversed. Holding the attack fixed and varying only the surrogate, raising the DI probability improves transfer from standard surrogates but degrades it from robust ones: the two response curves separate like a pair of scissors, a pattern we call the Scissors Effect. On ImageNet, blind DI costs a robust source 10.3 percentage points of attack success across four architecturally diverse targets; the effect is several times smaller at 32x32. Direct measurement supports a bias-variance account: DI displaces the gradient by a comparable amount on both groups but reduces its variance only where the gradient is noisy, and robust surrogates have little noise left to average away. A gradient-consistency probe, frozen and hashed before the runs, predicts the sign of the effect on seven unseen surrogates, and we report where it fails alongside where it works. The practical consequence holds independently of the mechanism: leaving DI enabled by default understates the attack a robust surrogate can mount, and so overstates the robustness of the model being evaluated. Code: this https URL.

Camera-ready version, published in Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2026). Project page: this https URL

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

arXiv:2606.22516 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2606.22516v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.22516 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

analiza aiqbench

The Scissors Effect: When Resize-Based Input Diversity Helps or Hurts Transfer Attacks

Subiecte conexe