analiza aiqbench
This paper proposes a foundational reinterpretation of quantum dynamics by distinguishing between Boolean logic governing the classical environment and non-Boolean logic for the observed system. It derives Planck's constant ($\hbar$) from the discrete logical structure of an ideal classical clock, establishing an exact mapping with 't Hooft's cellular automaton formalism without invoking hidden variables. The work offers a novel logical approach to the measurement problem by framing quantum evolution as potential recontextualization rather than fundamental indeterminacy.
The quantum-classical bipartite universe and the logical emergence of $\hbar$ from classical temporality
arXiv:2610.05083v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present a foundational reinterpretation of quantum dynamics based on the standard von Neumann formalism, positing a structural logical bipartition between a classical observational environment and a quantum observed system. Against universalist frameworks, we show that theoretical consistency requires distinct propositional logics: Boolean logic governs the environment, while non-Boolean logic applies to the observed system. Within this framework, an ideal classical clock is represented as an open system whose energy spectrum is uniformly discretized. The dynamics follow from the Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad (GKSL) master equation under the constraint that the Hamiltonian remains observable. Although the clock's temporal evolution is driven by dissipative coupling to the measurement apparatus, it admits a stable, deterministic solution corresponding to information-preserving cyclic dynamics. This deterministic regime emerges as a logical attractor, stabilized by the Boolean structure inherent to the measurement interaction. Ultimately, $\hbar$ is derived as a fundamental scaling parameter from the classical clock's action-angle commutation relation, revealing that the quantum of action reflects the discrete logical structure underlying classical temporality. Furthermore, this framework establishes an exact mapping with 't Hooft's cellular automaton formalism, offering an alternative ontological interpretation that not require hidden variables and superdeterministic assumptions. The resulting distinction between quantum dynamics (as potential recontextualization) and classical dynamics (as temporal actualization) provides a novel logical approach to the measurement problem.
Abstract:We present a foundational reinterpretation of quantum dynamics based on the standard von Neumann formalism, positing a structural logical bipartition between a classical observational environment and a quantum observed system. Against universalist frameworks, we show that theoretical consistency requires distinct propositional logics: Boolean logic governs the environment, while non-Boolean logic applies to the observed system. Within this framework, an ideal classical clock is represented as an open system whose energy spectrum is uniformly discretized. The dynamics follow from the Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad (GKSL) master equation under the constraint that the Hamiltonian remains observable. Although the clock's temporal evolution is driven by dissipative coupling to the measurement apparatus, it admits a stable, deterministic solution corresponding to information-preserving cyclic dynamics. This deterministic regime emerges as a logical attractor, stabilized by the Boolean structure inherent to the measurement interaction. Ultimately, $\hbar$ is derived as a fundamental scaling parameter from the classical clock's action-angle commutation relation, revealing that the quantum of action reflects the discrete logical structure underlying classical temporality. Furthermore, this framework establishes an exact mapping with 't Hooft's cellular automaton formalism, offering an alternative ontological interpretation that not require hidden variables and superdeterministic assumptions. The resulting distinction between quantum dynamics (as potential recontextualization) and classical dynamics (as temporal actualization) provides a novel logical approach to the measurement problem.
arXiv:2610.05083 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.05083v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05083 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 305 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

News
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026

AI and Quantum Computing Briefing
livetradingnews.com · 4 aug. 2026

Order Parameter Discovery for Quantum Many-Body Systems
Quantum Journal · 29 sept. 2026

Quantum agents can reason consistently, new framework shows
Quantum Zeitgeist · 10 sept. 2026