analiza aiqbench
This research introduces AgentFootprint, a critical benchmark that quantifies the hidden persistent storage overhead generated by LLM agents beyond standard inference costs. By exposing how different frameworks amplify data retention through duplication and inefficient serialization, it establishes disk footprint as an essential metric alongside accuracy for evaluating agent efficiency. The findings demonstrate that identical model configurations can vary significantly in resource consumption depending on persistence-layer choices, urging developers to optimize these factors jointly with task performance.
The Hidden Footprint: Making Storage a First-Class Metric for LLM Agent Evaluation
arXiv:2607.11149v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLM agent benchmarks measure task completion, reliability, and inference cost, but not the persistent data an agent run leaves on disk, including logs, context snapshots, checkpoints, and debug traces. We introduce AgentFootprint, a cross-framework benchmark of post-run agent storage footprint. Its serialization-aware metric suite measures total retention, channel composition, duplication, growth, compressibility, and conversation-history reconstructability. It addresses a measurement trap: naive byte-level measurement understates duplication by an order of magnitude because database paging and JSON escaping obscure repeated content. A fixed-trace control separates agent-generated logical volume from persistence-layer amplification: replaying the same trajectory through seven persisting frameworks yields a 6.7x spread. Under identical models, tools, and tasks, configurations with 100% accuracy differ by 15.7x in retained bytes, although their defaults support different recovery and audit capabilities. Three full-history configurations grow superlinearly on a repeated-observation stress task. Exported trajectories from 108 instance-normalized SWE-bench Verified submissions span three orders of magnitude per instance, with no detectable correlation with resolve rate. A content-addressed store reduces retention by 4.8x-32.7x while preserving every reconstructability score. These results establish persistent storage as a resource metric to report jointly with accuracy and reconstructability.
Abstract:LLM agent benchmarks measure task completion, reliability, and inference cost, but not the persistent data an agent run leaves on disk, including logs, context snapshots, checkpoints, and debug traces. We introduce AgentFootprint, a cross-framework benchmark of post-run agent storage footprint. Its serialization-aware metric suite measures total retention, channel composition, duplication, growth, compressibility, and conversation-history reconstructability. It addresses a measurement trap: naive byte-level measurement understates duplication by an order of magnitude because database paging and JSON escaping obscure repeated content. A fixed-trace control separates agent-generated logical volume from persistence-layer amplification: replaying the same trajectory through seven persisting frameworks yields a 6.7x spread. Under identical models, tools, and tasks, configurations with 100% accuracy differ by 15.7x in retained bytes, although their defaults support different recovery and audit capabilities. Three full-history configurations grow superlinearly on a repeated-observation stress task. Exported trajectories from 108 instance-normalized SWE-bench Verified submissions span three orders of magnitude per instance, with no detectable correlation with resolve rate. A content-addressed store reduces retention by 4.8x-32.7x while preserving every reconstructability score. These results establish persistent storage as a resource metric to report jointly with accuracy and reconstructability.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.11149 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2607.11149v3 [cs.AI] for this version)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 197 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Deploying Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B on Amazon SageMaker HyperPod with vLLM
AWS · 9 sept. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 18 sept. 2026

The total cost of AI ownership
Cohere · 15 iul. 2026

Article: The Platform Engineering Playbook for Production LLMs
InfoQ · 5 oct. 2026