The Gradient That Top-k Distillation Never Computes

arXiv:2610.15589v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many deployed distillation pipelines show the student a truncated view of the teacher: keep the top-k probabilities, renormalize, and minimize a divergence on what remains. Renormalization is assumed to account for the missing mass. We prove that it removes the visibility of tail mass, not the freedom to move it. The renormalized objective depends only on log-odds among the retained tokens, so at each position its gradient along the directions that control tail mass is exactly zero; on a real teacher that component measures $2$-$3\times10^{-15}$ of the gradient. The full-vocabulary gradient equals the truncated gradient plus a residual weighted by the tail masses, and training acts only on the first term. Without the cross-entropy term, a top-k student's tail mass drifts away from the teacher's while a full-vocabulary control moves slightly toward it; with it, the gap shrinks about fourfold but persists. On seven open-weight teachers, the retained set determines the teacher's distribution only from $k=d+1$ ($d$ the hidden dimension): recovery is exact from there on all seven, and commonly cached sizes sit below it. In our off-policy runs the practical effect is real but smaller than the choice of teacher-student pair. Renormalization is a normalization, not a safeguard. The code is available at https://github.com/KurbanIntelligenceLab/top-k-distillation.

Abstract:Many deployed distillation pipelines show the student a truncated view of the teacher: keep the top-k probabilities, renormalize, and minimize a divergence on what remains. Renormalization is assumed to account for the missing mass. We prove that it removes the visibility of tail mass, not the freedom to move it. The renormalized objective depends only on log-odds among the retained tokens, so at each position its gradient along the directions that control tail mass is exactly zero; on a real teacher that component measures $2$-$3\times10^{-15}$ of the gradient. The full-vocabulary gradient equals the truncated gradient plus a residual weighted by the tail masses, and training acts only on the first term. Without the cross-entropy term, a top-k student's tail mass drifts away from the teacher's while a full-vocabulary control moves slightly toward it; with it, the gap shrinks about fourfold but persists. On seven open-weight teachers, the retained set determines the teacher's distribution only from $k=d+1$ ($d$ the hidden dimension): recovery is exact from there on all seven, and commonly cached sizes sit below it. In our off-policy runs the practical effect is real but smaller than the choice of teacher-student pair. Renormalization is a normalization, not a safeguard. The code is available at this https URL.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.15589 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.15589v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.15589 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

analiza aiqbench

The Gradient That Top-k Distillation Never Computes

Subiecte conexe