analiza aiqbench
This research introduces a spectral update geometry combined with a "drift contract" to address the depth fragility and hyperparameter sensitivity inherent in local learning methods. By orthogonalizing momentum and scaling steps spectrally, the approach achieves superior accuracy and stability across varying network widths and depths without requiring extensive re-tuning. The study provides a rigorous mathematical framework that isolates spectral geometry as the primary driver of robustness, offering a significant advancement for scalable deep learning architectures.
The Drift Contract: Spectral Updates for Depth-Robust Local Learning
arXiv:2609.26811v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Local learning trains each layer with its own auxiliary loss and no global backward pass, which makes layer updates structurally parallel. Two problems have kept it marginal: accuracy degrades as depth grows, and hyperparameters are fragile. We apply Muon-style spectral update geometry (momentum orthogonalization with spectral step scaling) to per-layer local updates, an intersection not previously studied. On CIFAR-10 MLP benchmarks with local linear heads, a single step-size setting is the best value in our tested grids from width 128 to 2048 and from depth 12 to 48, while local Adam requires re-tuning along both axes and still collapses at depth 48 (31.3 percent re-tuned per depth, 19 percent with its depth-12 setting transferred, vs 42.7 percent for the spectral update at its unchanged setting). At five seeds and width 512 the spectral update leads local Adam by a clear margin (48.9 +/- 0.5 vs 46.6 +/- 0.3). Prospectively specified controls attribute the transfer and most of the depth robustness to the spectral geometry itself rather than to any step-size rule on top of it. We additionally formulate the step size as a drift contract, lr = epsilon / RMS(input), which bounds each layer's weight-induced pre-activation change per step, conditioned on its current input. The contract yields a small gain over the best fixed learning rate where that baseline is measured, makes the step size interpretable, and provides a per-layer, input-conditioned drift bound that standard optimizers do not offer. We report one negative result: with RMSNorm and weight decay in the trunk, the stability benefit of spectral updates accrues to global rather than local training, so the local advantage concentrates precisely where normalization is absent.
Abstract:Local learning trains each layer with its own auxiliary loss and no global backward pass, which makes layer updates structurally parallel. Two problems have kept it marginal: accuracy degrades as depth grows, and hyperparameters are fragile. We apply Muon-style spectral update geometry (momentum orthogonalization with spectral step scaling) to per-layer local updates, an intersection not previously studied. On CIFAR-10 MLP benchmarks with local linear heads, a single step-size setting is the best value in our tested grids from width 128 to 2048 and from depth 12 to 48, while local Adam requires re-tuning along both axes and still collapses at depth 48 (31.3 percent re-tuned per depth, 19 percent with its depth-12 setting transferred, vs 42.7 percent for the spectral update at its unchanged setting). At five seeds and width 512 the spectral update leads local Adam by a clear margin (48.9 +/- 0.5 vs 46.6 +/- 0.3). Prospectively specified controls attribute the transfer and most of the depth robustness to the spectral geometry itself rather than to any step-size rule on top of it. We additionally formulate the step size as a drift contract, lr = epsilon / RMS(input), which bounds each layer's weight-induced pre-activation change per step, conditioned on its current input. The contract yields a small gain over the best fixed learning rate where that baseline is measured, makes the step size interpretable, and provides a per-layer, input-conditioned drift bound that standard optimizers do not offer. We report one negative result: with RMSNorm and weight decay in the trunk, the stability benefit of spectral updates accrues to global rather than local training, so the local advantage concentrates precisely where normalization is absent.
7 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables. Code and raw results: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.26811 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.26811v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26811 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 380 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Frontier Risk Report (February to March 2026)
METR · 19 mai 2026
Frontier AI Risk Report (February–March 2026)
METR · 19 mai 2026
Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · 19 mai 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · 23 sept. 2026