analiza aiqbench
This research introduces a decision-specific audit framework for AI agents, demonstrating how deterministic extraction can resolve significant uncertainty in user preference modeling without additional model calls. The study highlights critical limitations in current telemetry strategies, showing that many unresolved intervals stem from structural ambiguity rather than insufficient data collection. By proposing source-labeled decision receipts and offline inspection tools, the work offers a rigorous method for validating agent choices before deploying further resources.
The Delegation Blind Spot: Auditing Product Decisions from Agent Choices
arXiv:2609.26642v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Successful agent execution need not identify which future product improvement its user would value. We present a decision-specific audit that maps a declared observation channel and product-value contrast to compatible intervals and witness populations. Its foundations are established identification and decision theory; the contribution is an executable measurement workflow and a controlled study of its limits. A frozen experiment makes 4,800 requests to two pinned model snapshots on shared synthetic tasks. All 36 conservative primary intervals remain unresolved despite different execution accuracy. An exploratory 2,400-call follow-up records supplied preferences and resolves three of nine comparisons per model. A deterministic extractor resolves seven of nine without model calls or calibration observations, exposing unnecessary uncertainty introduced by model-generated reports. A further 14,400 controlled multinomial simulations distinguish structural ambiguity from weak identification and finite calibration precision. We propose a source-labeled decision receipt and provide an offline viewer for inspecting the audit. These results motivate preserving decision-relevant structured input and diagnosing why a decision is unresolved before collecting more telemetry. The study contains no human participants or real customer outcomes. Full proofs, raw model provenance, controlled experiments, and reproducible analyses accompany the report.
Abstract:Successful agent execution need not identify which future product improvement its user would value. We present a decision-specific audit that maps a declared observation channel and product-value contrast to compatible intervals and witness populations. Its foundations are established identification and decision theory; the contribution is an executable measurement workflow and a controlled study of its limits. A frozen experiment makes 4,800 requests to two pinned model snapshots on shared synthetic tasks. All 36 conservative primary intervals remain unresolved despite different execution accuracy. An exploratory 2,400-call follow-up records supplied preferences and resolves three of nine comparisons per model. A deterministic extractor resolves seven of nine without model calls or calibration observations, exposing unnecessary uncertainty introduced by model-generated reports. A further 14,400 controlled multinomial simulations distinguish structural ambiguity from weak identification and finite calibration precision. We propose a source-labeled decision receipt and provide an offline viewer for inspecting the audit. These results motivate preserving decision-relevant structured input and diagnosing why a decision is unresolved before collecting more telemetry. The study contains no human participants or real customer outcomes. Full proofs, raw model provenance, controlled experiments, and reproducible analyses accompany the report.
15 pages, 5 figures. Computational technical report with proofs and synthetic-task experiments; no human participants. Code: this https URL
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.26642 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.26642v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26642 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 305 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Podcast: Securing AI Agents: Identity, Authorization, and the DPACT Framework
InfoQ · 21 sept. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 3 oct. 2026

An Organizational Second Brain: Building an AI That Learns From Experts
Meta Engineering · 2 sept. 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026