Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This research investigates the fundamental gap between memorization and rule recovery in shallow multilayer perceptrons, specifically analyzing how optimization algorithms like SGD, Adam, and Muon handle higher-order interactions and nuisance inputs. The findings reveal that training dynamics are heavily constrained by these factors, demonstrating that a network can achieve perfect accuracy on data while failing to learn the underlying generative logic of synthetic parity tasks.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

The Conflict Between Logic and Memory: Learning Higher-Order Interactions in Shallow MLPs

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.00403v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A network can fit its training examples while failing to recover the rule that generated their labels. We examine this separation in single-hidden-layer multilayer perceptrons (MLPs), using synthetic tasks that control interaction order and the presence of nuisance inputs. We establish elementary benchmark properties: pure parity contains no predictive lower-order marginals, admits an exact Bayes posterior, and can be represented on clean latent inputs by a width-$k$ ReLU network. Experiments then identify distinct optimization outcomes. In a matched order-2--4 sweep, SGD, Adam, and Muon all reach 100\% peak test accuracy at order two; at order three they reach 96.25\%, 50.87\%, and 76.82\%, respectively, while Muon reaches 99.21\% at order four. In a separate mixed-order task, freezing only the first-layer weights connected to independent nuisance inputs raises AdamW's epoch-10 accuracy from 44.73\% to 95.07\%. Removing the same inputs only at test time raises it to 48.38\%. Thus, nuisance-weight learning changes the training outcome beyond its immediate effect on prediction. Bias interventions expose a connection between target symmetry and shallow ReLU representations. In a compact signal-only regime, both SGD and Muon learn orders five through eight, with higher SGD peak accuracy at orders nine through eleven. Together, the results show how optimization and nuisance learning constrain the higher-order rules realized by a shallow network.

Abstract:A network can fit its training examples while failing to recover the rule that generated their labels. We examine this separation in single-hidden-layer multilayer perceptrons (MLPs), using synthetic tasks that control interaction order and the presence of nuisance inputs. We establish elementary benchmark properties: pure parity contains no predictive lower-order marginals, admits an exact Bayes posterior, and can be represented on clean latent inputs by a width-$k$ ReLU network. Experiments then identify distinct optimization outcomes. In a matched order-2--4 sweep, SGD, Adam, and Muon all reach 100\% peak test accuracy at order two; at order three they reach 96.25\%, 50.87\%, and 76.82\%, respectively, while Muon reaches 99.21\% at order four. In a separate mixed-order task, freezing only the first-layer weights connected to independent nuisance inputs raises AdamW's epoch-10 accuracy from 44.73\% to 95.07\%. Removing the same inputs only at test time raises it to 48.38\%. Thus, nuisance-weight learning changes the training outcome beyond its immediate effect on prediction. Bias interventions expose a connection between target symmetry and shallow ReLU representations. In a compact signal-only regime, both SGD and Muon learn orders five through eight, with higher SGD peak accuracy at orders nine through eleven. Together, the results show how optimization and nuisance learning constrain the higher-order rules realized by a shallow network.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.00403 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.00403v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00403 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 306 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe