analiza aiqbench
This research establishes sharp geometric laws governing the rank complexity of normalized softmax attention, distinguishing between worst-case support geometry and per-head interaction dimensions. By calibrating these theoretical bounds on BERT-base models, the study provides rigorous certificates for effective dimension reduction across various temperature settings without relying on empirical heuristics. These findings offer a foundational understanding of how geometric constraints limit the expressivity and efficiency of transformer attention mechanisms.
The Approximation Rank of Softmax Attention: Sharp Geometric Laws and Robust Interaction Dimension
arXiv:2608.28150v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Which geometry controls the rank complexity of normalized softmax attention? We study maximum-row-$\ell_1$ approximation rank, exactly the least unrestricted rank preserving every bounded vector-valued output. Two sharp worst-case laws isolate support geometry: for fixed $d$ and error $\varepsilon$, spherical self-attention has rank $\Theta_{d,\varepsilon}(\min\{n,(1+\beta)^{(d-1)/2}\})$, while full-ball geometry adds one radial degree and, for $\beta\ge\beta_0(d,\varepsilon)$ and $n\ge C_d e^{\beta/8}$, gives $\Theta_{d,\varepsilon}(\beta^{d/2})$. For a fixed head, row-softmax quotients out row-scalar logit directions: the remaining visible query--key interaction dimension $r$ yields an $r/2$ per-instance upper law, and bounded constructions show this exponent is minimax sharp. Approximate interaction subspaces incur an explicit residual output error and yield a tolerance-indexed SVD dimension. On an 84-head BERT-base calibration set, we observe modest effective-dimension reductions across many head--temperature settings, together with positive associations with finite constructive rank upper certificates. Together, these results separate support geometry, which sets worst-case temperature scaling, from softmax-visible interaction geometry, which controls per-head approximation complexity.
Abstract:Which geometry controls the rank complexity of normalized softmax attention? We study maximum-row-$\ell_1$ approximation rank, exactly the least unrestricted rank preserving every bounded vector-valued output. Two sharp worst-case laws isolate support geometry: for fixed $d$ and error $\varepsilon$, spherical self-attention has rank $\Theta_{d,\varepsilon}(\min\{n,(1+\beta)^{(d-1)/2}\})$, while full-ball geometry adds one radial degree and, for $\beta\ge\beta_0(d,\varepsilon)$ and $n\ge C_d e^{\beta/8}$, gives $\Theta_{d,\varepsilon}(\beta^{d/2})$. For a fixed head, row-softmax quotients out row-scalar logit directions: the remaining visible query--key interaction dimension $r$ yields an $r/2$ per-instance upper law, and bounded constructions show this exponent is minimax sharp. Approximate interaction subspaces incur an explicit residual output error and yield a tolerance-indexed SVD dimension. On an 84-head BERT-base calibration set, we observe modest effective-dimension reductions across many head--temperature settings, together with positive associations with finite constructive rank upper certificates. Together, these results separate support geometry, which sets worst-case temperature scaling, from softmax-visible interaction geometry, which controls per-head approximation complexity.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.28150 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.28150v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28150 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 248 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · 27 iul. 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · 21 iul. 2026
The Entropic Bound for Transformers: Why Static Rank Fails and Attention-Native Rank Recovers
arXiv · 28 iul. 2026

Stock Market Today Highlights, Sept 2: Sensex ends 373 pts lower at 76, 570, Nifty below 24, 000; Asian Paints, HDFC Bank fall most
thehindubusinessline.com · 2 sept. 2026