Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchProduse AI

analiza aiqbench

This paper addresses the critical bottleneck where enterprise AI agents fail to scale beyond initial demos due to architectural mismatches between human-centric data structures and model reasoning needs. The authors propose a "substrate inversion" strategy that rebuilds the shared cognitive environment around agent-native representations, specifically isolating schema translation to an action boundary to ensure sustained operation and feedback retention. This approach effectively bridges classical multi-agent system theory with modern LLM economics to solve the reproducibility crisis in agentic workflows.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

The Agentic Company OS: Substrate Inversion for Sustained Enterprise Agent Deployment

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.13334v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Enterprise AI agents often succeed in a demonstration and then stall once they must operate day after day. An industry report estimates that most pilots never reach production and that deployed systems rarely retain feedback or improve over time, while agent benchmarks show single-run successes masking unreliable repetition. We argue that these failure modes share a common architectural root: agents reason over data structured for human operators and traditional applications, not for the language models that power them. This position paper proposes that companies deploying agents in sustained operation should rebuild their cognitive substrate, the shared environment agents read as working context, around representations matched to that reasoning surface, isolating schema translation to the action boundary. Markdown is the instantiation available today, not a proven agent-native primitive. Two mechanisms ground the argument: context-bandwidth asymmetry, the gap between one-pass reading of connected prose and field-by-field typed access that strips relations; and cross-loop coupling, the claim that action, skill, and policy loops compound only if they share one substrate. A four-layer framework (Data, Knowledge, Intelligence, Governance) operationalizes the position, with a Sync Agent enforcing the action boundary and a per-skill trust gradient, making governance and auditability structural properties of the substrate. The position revives the shared-substrate tradition of classical multi-agent systems under LLM-era economics. We analyze the main objections and risks, including indirect prompt injection on the compile path, and outline a research agenda for evaluating substrates directly.

Abstract:Enterprise AI agents often succeed in a demonstration and then stall once they must operate day after day. An industry report estimates that most pilots never reach production and that deployed systems rarely retain feedback or improve over time, while agent benchmarks show single-run successes masking unreliable repetition. We argue that these failure modes share a common architectural root: agents reason over data structured for human operators and traditional applications, not for the language models that power them. This position paper proposes that companies deploying agents in sustained operation should rebuild their cognitive substrate, the shared environment agents read as working context, around representations matched to that reasoning surface, isolating schema translation to the action boundary. Markdown is the instantiation available today, not a proven agent-native primitive. Two mechanisms ground the argument: context-bandwidth asymmetry, the gap between one-pass reading of connected prose and field-by-field typed access that strips relations; and cross-loop coupling, the claim that action, skill, and policy loops compound only if they share one substrate. A four-layer framework (Data, Knowledge, Intelligence, Governance) operationalizes the position, with a Sync Agent enforcing the action boundary and a per-skill trust gradient, making governance and auditability structural properties of the substrate. The position revives the shared-substrate tradition of classical multi-agent systems under LLM-era economics. We analyze the main objections and risks, including indirect prompt injection on the compile path, and outline a research agenda for evaluating substrates directly.

19 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables. Accepted as a peer-reviewed short paper (position-paper track) at the 2nd International Conference on Agentic and Generative Techniques in Intelligent Computational Systems (AGENTICS 2026), Angers, France, 28-30 October 2026, part of IJCCI 2026, and for publication in the Springer CCIS proceedings. This is the author's accepted manuscript

Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

arXiv:2609.13334 [cs.SE]

(or arXiv:2609.13334v1 [cs.SE] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13334 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 313 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe