analiza aiqbench
Temperon optimizes training efficiency by allocating Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) resources exclusively to the final phase of learning, where its benefits are most concentrated. This approach matches full-time SAM accuracy on standard benchmarks while reducing wall-clock time by approximately 30% across diverse tasks including GPT-2 pretraining and GLUE fine-tuning. The method demonstrates that early training can effectively proceed with plain SGD, reserving expensive robustness checks for the convergence stage.
Temperon: Full-Time SAM Quality at a Third Less Wall-Clock
arXiv:2609.17575v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) doubles the cost of every training step, yet its benefit concentrates where training ends. We study where an expensive training mode should be spent and propose Temperon: a plain-SGD explorer for the first 43% of the epoch budget, then one scheduled hand-off that gives the entire final cosine anneal to a SAM-wrapped Muon refiner. On CIFAR-10/100, SVHN and Tiny ImageNet (five seeds, times reported as epochs-to-target times an idle-GPU-calibrated epoch cost), Temperon matches the best full-time-SAM recipe on accuracy everywhere while reaching the hardest common target 35%, 34% and 32% sooner on three of the four, and sits a tier above the published SAM+SGD recipe at level cost. Ablations make the attribution exact: the Muon refiner is worth +0.85pp with everything else fixed; the explorer's shape and its restarts are worth nothing, and we withdraw them as contributions. Re-running the closest rival, late-phase SAM, at matched budget shows the frontier: it is fastest to every mid-level target, but the tier the Muon refiner buys (0.83 on CIFAR-100, 0.97 on CIFAR-10) is reached by no SGD-refined method in any seed, and on Tiny ImageNet, where Muon buys no tier, the rival simply wins -- the measured boundary of the method. The allocation law transfers to GPT-2 pretraining (full-SAM quality at -29% wall-clock) and GLUE fine-tuning (never worse than full-time SAM at a third of its SAM cost). Two constants organize the economics: skipping SAM early buys a fixed credit, and a Muon epoch costs 1.50x a SAM+SGD epoch on all four datasets. Finally, the hand-off cannot be timed from the trajectory: under cosine schedules the accuracy curve is plateau-then-surge, so the information lives in the schedule, making the scheduled switch principled rather than convenient. Code and a pip-installable implementation are released.
Abstract:Sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) doubles the cost of every training step, yet its benefit concentrates where training ends. We study where an expensive training mode should be spent and propose Temperon: a plain-SGD explorer for the first 43% of the epoch budget, then one scheduled hand-off that gives the entire final cosine anneal to a SAM-wrapped Muon refiner. On CIFAR-10/100, SVHN and Tiny ImageNet (five seeds, times reported as epochs-to-target times an idle-GPU-calibrated epoch cost), Temperon matches the best full-time-SAM recipe on accuracy everywhere while reaching the hardest common target 35%, 34% and 32% sooner on three of the four, and sits a tier above the published SAM+SGD recipe at level cost. Ablations make the attribution exact: the Muon refiner is worth +0.85pp with everything else fixed; the explorer's shape and its restarts are worth nothing, and we withdraw them as contributions. Re-running the closest rival, late-phase SAM, at matched budget shows the frontier: it is fastest to every mid-level target, but the tier the Muon refiner buys (0.83 on CIFAR-100, 0.97 on CIFAR-10) is reached by no SGD-refined method in any seed, and on Tiny ImageNet, where Muon buys no tier, the rival simply wins -- the measured boundary of the method. The allocation law transfers to GPT-2 pretraining (full-SAM quality at -29% wall-clock) and GLUE fine-tuning (never worse than full-time SAM at a third of its SAM cost). Two constants organize the economics: skipping SAM early buys a fixed credit, and a Muon epoch costs 1.50x a SAM+SGD epoch on all four datasets. Finally, the hand-off cannot be timed from the trajectory: under cosine schedules the accuracy curve is plateau-then-surge, so the information lives in the schedule, making the scheduled switch principled rather than convenient. Code and a pip-installable implementation are released.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2609.17575 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.17575v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.17575 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 393 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 10 sept. 2026
Against Export Controls (and China Threat Models)
LessWrong · 24 sept. 2026

Can we change an AI model’s architecture without retraining it from scratch?
Amazon Science · 12 oct. 2026

Frontier AI Risk Report (February–March 2026)
METR · 19 mai 2026