analiza aiqbench
This research introduces a framework where LLM agents generate synthetic student errors aligned with specific cognitive taxonomies for educational applications. The study demonstrates that creating targeted, class-consistent mistakes is significantly more challenging than producing generic incorrect answers, highlighting the value of answer-grounding techniques in building high-quality training datasets. This work advances machine learning capabilities by providing scalable methods to annotate error mechanisms without relying on costly collection of authentic student data.
Taxonomy-Targeted Error Generation for Quantitative Reasoning
arXiv:2605.29007v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Personalized tutoring, teacher preparation, and education research can benefit from worked errors annotated by the mechanisms that produced them. Authentic student errors with such cognitive labels are costly to collect and share, motivating the study of whether LLMs can generate taxonomy-targeted synthetic errors as complementary candidate material. We present a task-specific framework that generates errors targeted to a five-class Bloom-informed student-error taxonomy. A Generation Agent (GA) drafts a candidate erroneous solution conditioned on a target class, and an Examination Agent (EA) judges whether the draft is incorrect and class-consistent. The framework yields a reusable recipe for building class-stratified synthetic error datasets where authentic student corpora are unavailable. As a secondary diagnostic, targeted error generation is substantially harder than free-form incorrect-answer generation, and answer-grounding contributes more than expanded examples or external textbook content.
Abstract:Personalized tutoring, teacher preparation, and education research can benefit from worked errors annotated by the mechanisms that produced them. Authentic student errors with such cognitive labels are costly to collect and share, motivating the study of whether LLMs can generate taxonomy-targeted synthetic errors as complementary candidate material. We present a task-specific framework that generates errors targeted to a five-class Bloom-informed student-error taxonomy. A Generation Agent (GA) drafts a candidate erroneous solution conditioned on a target class, and an Examination Agent (EA) judges whether the draft is incorrect and class-consistent. The framework yields a reusable recipe for building class-stratified synthetic error datasets where authentic student corpora are unavailable. As a secondary diagnostic, targeted error generation is substantially harder than free-form incorrect-answer generation, and answer-grounding contributes more than expanded examples or external textbook content.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2605.29007 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2605.29007v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.29007 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 225 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Building trust in AI agents: A production-ready evaluation framework with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · 16 oct. 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · 27 iul. 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · 5 oct. 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · 13 oct. 2026