Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchProduse AI

analiza aiqbench

This study benchmarks Corti, a specialized clinical AI platform, against general-purpose ambient scribes using a new multilingual dataset and a rigorous evaluation framework. Results indicate that the API-based text generation infrastructure of this clinical tool performs on par with or exceeds leading commercial alternatives in note quality. The release of the MedConv dataset and methodology provides a critical resource for reproducible comparisons in healthcare AI applications.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Symphony for Text Generation: Benchmarking Clinical Note Generation

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.08161v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ambient documentation systems are rapidly gaining adoption, yet their impact on clinical note quality remains poorly characterized. We introduce MedConv, a multilingual dataset of 300 clinical encounters in English, Danish, and German, and use it alongside the Ambient Clinical Intelligence benchmark (ACI-BENCH) to compare Corti, a clinical AI platform, with two leading, accessible ambient scribe software applications built on general-purpose AI. We present a controlled clinical evaluation framework that combines entailment metrics with LLM-judged pairwise comparisons across eight dimensions adopted from PDSQI-9. Results show that Corti's API-based text-generation infrastructure is on par with or outperforms leading commercial scribes. We further show that Corti's configurable API provides the flexibility necessary to fine-tune quality dimensions for specific documentation use cases. We present the evaluation methodology and release a dataset to support future reproducible comparison of ambient documentation systems.

Authors:Daniel Varab, Victor Petrén Bach Hansen, Asbjørn W. Helge, Kevin Pelgrims, Mathias Baltzersen, Adrian Young-San Roessler, Vanessa Klungtvedt, Maximilian Brand, Lasse Krogsbøll, Henrik Cullen, Lars Maaløe

Abstract:Ambient documentation systems are rapidly gaining adoption, yet their impact on clinical note quality remains poorly characterized. We introduce MedConv, a multilingual dataset of 300 clinical encounters in English, Danish, and German, and use it alongside the Ambient Clinical Intelligence benchmark (ACI-BENCH) to compare Corti, a clinical AI platform, with two leading, accessible ambient scribe software applications built on general-purpose AI. We present a controlled clinical evaluation framework that combines entailment metrics with LLM-judged pairwise comparisons across eight dimensions adopted from PDSQI-9. Results show that Corti's API-based text-generation infrastructure is on par with or outperforms leading commercial scribes. We further show that Corti's configurable API provides the flexibility necessary to fine-tune quality dimensions for specific documentation use cases. We present the evaluation methodology and release a dataset to support future reproducible comparison of ambient documentation systems.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.08161 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.08161v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08161 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 187 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe