Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This research introduces Swiss-Knife, a novel framework that treats alignment specifications as runtime objects, enabling hot-swappable objectives without gradient computation. By proving a representation theorem for aggregation operators and implementing Candidate-Batch Normalization, the method achieves superior balance across helpfulness, honesty, and harmlessness while demonstrating robustness against reward contamination. The work advances decode-time alignment by moving beyond degenerate single-objective designs toward a flexible, axiomatic architecture for multi-goal optimization.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Swiss-Knife: A Framework for Reconfigurable Externalised Multi-Objective Alignment at Decode Time

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.22226v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decode-time alignment methods steer a frozen language model by scoring candidate continuations with an external reward and selecting the maximiser. We argue that this shared design is a single degenerate point in a much larger space. We introduce Swiss-Knife, a framework for externalised multi-objective alignment in which the alignment specification is a first-class runtime object: hot-swappable scoring blades, a batch normaliser, a pairwise aggregation operator, and a selection rule. Six axioms characterise the admissible aggregation operators, and we prove a representation theorem: every operator satisfying them has the form $R_i = \sum_{j \neq i} g((\mu_i - \mu_j)/s(\sigma_i,\sigma_j))$, a two-parameter family containing probit and logistic comparison rules and pointwise argmax as named coordinates. Within it, pairwise aggregation is Lipschitz-stable under adversarial reward contamination while argmax is not, and Candidate-Batch Normalization (CBN) makes the weight simplex invariant to the rescalings under which reward models are only ever identified. Our reference instantiation pairs DPO-LoRA blades with an uncertainty-aware pairwise tournament. Sweeping the helpfulness/honesty/harmlessness simplex, it attains the best balanced frontier of six decode-time methods (harmonic $F_1$ 0.797 vs. 0.750 for the strongest baseline, $p < 10^{-14}$) with the lowest refusal rate and highest helpfulness of any arm, and reconfigures its objectives in 0.05 ms with no gradient computation. Ablating CBN costs 0.217 $F_1$, and the metadata confirms the predicted mechanism: the lowest-variance blade retains 9% of its nominal 33% influence, and the collapse follows the predicted ordering.

Abstract:Decode-time alignment methods steer a frozen language model by scoring candidate continuations with an external reward and selecting the maximiser. We argue that this shared design is a single degenerate point in a much larger space. We introduce Swiss-Knife, a framework for externalised multi-objective alignment in which the alignment specification is a first-class runtime object: hot-swappable scoring blades, a batch normaliser, a pairwise aggregation operator, and a selection rule. Six axioms characterise the admissible aggregation operators, and we prove a representation theorem: every operator satisfying them has the form $R_i = \sum_{j \neq i} g((\mu_i - \mu_j)/s(\sigma_i,\sigma_j))$, a two-parameter family containing probit and logistic comparison rules and pointwise argmax as named coordinates. Within it, pairwise aggregation is Lipschitz-stable under adversarial reward contamination while argmax is not, and Candidate-Batch Normalization (CBN) makes the weight simplex invariant to the rescalings under which reward models are only ever identified. Our reference instantiation pairs DPO-LoRA blades with an uncertainty-aware pairwise tournament. Sweeping the helpfulness/honesty/harmlessness simplex, it attains the best balanced frontier of six decode-time methods (harmonic $F_1$ 0.797 vs. 0.750 for the strongest baseline, $p < 10^{-14}$) with the lowest refusal rate and highest helpfulness of any arm, and reconfigures its objectives in 0.05 ms with no gradient computation. Ablating CBN costs 0.217 $F_1$, and the metadata confirms the predicted mechanism: the lowest-variance blade retains 9% of its nominal 33% influence, and the collapse follows the predicted ordering.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2609.22226 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.22226v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22226 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 335 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe