analiza aiqbench
The SWE-Journey benchmark addresses critical gaps in evaluating coding assistants by simulating long-horizon development tasks and multi-turn interactions with diverse user personas. Results reveal a significant performance disparity between models interacting with expert software architects versus non-coders, highlighting that current LLM agents struggle to reliably assist non-experts in complex workflows. This research underscores the need for improved capabilities in requirement clarification and iterative debugging to bridge the gap between synthetic benchmarks and real-world coding environments.
SWE-Journey: Towards More Realistic Evaluation of Coding Assistants through Long-Horizon, Multi-Turn Interaction
arXiv:2610.11559v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Coding assistants such as Claude Code and Codex have become a major application of LLM agents, yet existing benchmarks remain far from real-world use, particularly in task horizon and interaction length. Code assistants require completing long chains of development work in continuously evolving repositories, while repeatedly clarifying requirements and adapting implementations through multi-turn interaction. To address these gaps, we introduce SWE-Journey, a benchmark for more realistic evaluation of coding assistants. To address the task-horizon gap, we propose a weak-to-strong synthesis pipeline that automatically constructs long-horizon coding tasks. To address the interaction gap, we mine four representative user personas from real interaction data and build a user-simulation agent to reproduce realistic code-assistance interactions. On average, models pass over 75% of tests for requested functionality with software architects, but fewer than 25% with non-coders. These results show that current coding assistants still fall short of enabling reliable coding for non-coders. We further analyze the reasons for this gap and identify asking right, finding right, and fixing right as key capabilities during interaction.
Abstract:Coding assistants such as Claude Code and Codex have become a major application of LLM agents, yet existing benchmarks remain far from real-world use, particularly in task horizon and interaction length. Code assistants require completing long chains of development work in continuously evolving repositories, while repeatedly clarifying requirements and adapting implementations through multi-turn interaction. To address these gaps, we introduce SWE-Journey, a benchmark for more realistic evaluation of coding assistants. To address the task-horizon gap, we propose a weak-to-strong synthesis pipeline that automatically constructs long-horizon coding tasks. To address the interaction gap, we mine four representative user personas from real interaction data and build a user-simulation agent to reproduce realistic code-assistance interactions. On average, models pass over 75% of tests for requested functionality with software architects, but fewer than 25% with non-coders. These results show that current coding assistants still fall short of enabling reliable coding for non-coders. We further analyze the reasons for this gap and identify asking right, finding right, and fixing right as key capabilities during interaction.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
arXiv:2610.11559 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.11559v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.11559 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 274 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · 21 mai 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · 13 oct. 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026