analiza aiqbench
SWE-Game introduces a rigorous benchmark for evaluating coding agents in game development, utilizing executable Godot games and vision-language rubrics to assess mechanic correctness and playability. The study reveals that while models like Opus5 lead current capabilities, significant gaps remain in translating design documents into functional gameplay logic, with executable checks proving far more accurate than video-based visual judges. This work advances the field by providing a standardized method to measure agent performance on complex, interactive software tasks beyond simple code generation.
SWE-Game: Can Coding Agents Build the Games We Want?
arXiv:2609.33678v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce SWE-Game, a benchmark of 247 tasks grounded in 41 executable reference Godot games spanning 13 gameplay categories in 2D and 3D. Five task types cover development from a brief, implementation from a game design document, skeleton completion, repair of 83 injected-fault cases, and Godot-to-Unity porting. Reference materials specify the intended gameplay, while a shared instrumentation interface lets evaluator-owned drivers and probes execute actions and observe independently implemented games. Evaluation combines engine-state checks, certified reference-input replay, and agent-authored feature demonstrations to assess mechanic correctness, demonstrated playability, and behavioral restoration and preservation after repairs. Game-specific vision-language rubrics separately assess presentation. Across six models, Opus5 achieves the highest overall score in all five task types. Best overall scores remain below 60 out of 100 across the three construction tasks, with Brief-to-Game reaching 50.38. Analysis of reviewed submissions identifies requirement omissions and gameplay logic errors as predominant implementation problems. On human-labeled behaviors from 100 agent-built games, executable checks achieve 92.59% balanced accuracy, compared with 78.41% for a video-based VLM judge. Rubric-based visual scores reach a Spearman correlation of 0.829 with human ratings of 200 gameplay clips. Together, these results characterize current agent capabilities across game-development activities and support combining runtime evidence with visual assessment.
Title:SWE-Game: Can Coding Agents Build the Games We Want?
Abstract:We introduce SWE-Game, a benchmark of 247 tasks grounded in 41 executable reference Godot games spanning 13 gameplay categories in 2D and 3D. Five task types cover development from a brief, implementation from a game design document, skeleton completion, repair of 83 injected-fault cases, and Godot-to-Unity porting. Reference materials specify the intended gameplay, while a shared instrumentation interface lets evaluator-owned drivers and probes execute actions and observe independently implemented games. Evaluation combines engine-state checks, certified reference-input replay, and agent-authored feature demonstrations to assess mechanic correctness, demonstrated playability, and behavioral restoration and preservation after repairs. Game-specific vision-language rubrics separately assess presentation. Across six models, Opus5 achieves the highest overall score in all five task types. Best overall scores remain below 60 out of 100 across the three construction tasks, with Brief-to-Game reaching 50.38. Analysis of reviewed submissions identifies requirement omissions and gameplay logic errors as predominant implementation problems. On human-labeled behaviors from 100 agent-built games, executable checks achieve 92.59% balanced accuracy, compared with 78.41% for a video-based VLM judge. Rubric-based visual scores reach a Spearman correlation of 0.829 with human ratings of 200 gameplay clips. Together, these results characterize current agent capabilities across game-development activities and support combining runtime evidence with visual assessment.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.33678 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.33678v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.33678 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 305 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Claude Code’s Next Era — Thariq Shihipar, Anthropic
Latent Space · 29 sept. 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · 14 sept. 2026

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · 6 aug. 2026