Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This study introduces a controlled content overlap metric using parallel Bible translations to diagnose whether style classifiers rely on genuine stylistic features or content shortcuts. Results indicate that models trained on high-overlap data transfer more robustly when content cues are removed, offering a practical diagnostic for separating true style learning from data leakage. For researchers in natural language processing, this framework provides a systematic method to evaluate and improve the reliability of style transfer models.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, Quantum Zeitgeist, Latent Space, Cybersecurity News
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Style or Content? Evaluating Style Classifiers with Controlled Content Overlap

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2606.07103v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Style classifiers can use content cues that correlate with style labels in naturally collected data, yet we lack a systematic way to measure this reliance. We study this problem with a controlled content overlap setup built on parallel Bible translations. Specifically, we define the overlap parameter $\alpha$ as the normalized residual of mutual information between content identity and style label, so that it measures how much content is shared across style classes: from no shared content ($\alpha=0$) to fully shared content ($\alpha=1$). Cross-overlap evaluation of RoBERTa-based classifiers shows that low-overlap models degrade when content cues are removed, while high-overlap models transfer more robustly. A cross-style content retrieval probe further shows that content becomes less recoverable as $\alpha$ increases, with training dynamics showing this removal occurs gradually. Together, these results suggest that controlled overlap provides a simple diagnostic for separating style learning from content shortcuts.

Title:Style or Content? Evaluating Style Classifiers with Controlled Content Overlap

Abstract:Style classifiers can use content cues that correlate with style labels in naturally collected data, yet we lack a systematic way to measure this reliance. We study this problem with a controlled content overlap setup built on parallel Bible translations. Specifically, we define the overlap parameter $\alpha$ as the normalized residual of mutual information between content identity and style label, so that it measures how much content is shared across style classes: from no shared content ($\alpha=0$) to fully shared content ($\alpha=1$). Cross-overlap evaluation of RoBERTa-based classifiers shows that low-overlap models degrade when content cues are removed, while high-overlap models transfer more robustly. A cross-style content retrieval probe further shows that content becomes less recoverable as $\alpha$ increases, with training dynamics showing this removal occurs gradually. Together, these results suggest that controlled overlap provides a simple diagnostic for separating style learning from content shortcuts.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2606.07103 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2606.07103v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07103 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 249 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe