analiza aiqbench
Composing insight from the full article — this may take a moment.
Structured Clinical Memory as Context for Probabilistic Decision Models: A Synthetic Evaluation with Jev
arXiv:2611.04101v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Longitudinal clinical context is often distributed across noisy, repetitive forms and narrative records. We study whether a compact structured memory can improve a probabilistic decision model's answers when the underlying patient vignette is already available. We created 30 fully synthetic cases spanning twelve clinical domains, paired each with synthetically generated structured memory, and evaluated 120 typed questions with Jev. The raw-vignette arm achieved 90.0% accuracy (95% normal-approximation confidence interval: 84.6%-95.4%); adding memory achieved 93.3% (88.9%-97.8%). Five questions changed from incorrect to correct and one changed in the opposite direction (exact McNemar $p=0.219$). Choice log loss decreased from 0.258 to 0.175 and binary Brier score from 0.054 to 0.022. Memory added 310 input tokens per call on average, while observed mean latency was unchanged at approximately 0.5 seconds. These results are directionally positive rather than clinically validating: the cases are synthetic, the labels are single-author judgments, and the memory is an oracle upper bound rather than extracted production output. The pilot supports evaluating structured clinical memory as a reusable state interface for decision models.
Abstract:Longitudinal clinical context is often distributed across noisy, repetitive forms and narrative records. We study whether a compact structured memory can improve a probabilistic decision model's answers when the underlying patient vignette is already available. We created 30 fully synthetic cases spanning twelve clinical domains, paired each with synthetically generated structured memory, and evaluated 120 typed questions with Jev. The raw-vignette arm achieved 90.0% accuracy (95% normal-approximation confidence interval: 84.6%-95.4%); adding memory achieved 93.3% (88.9%-97.8%). Five questions changed from incorrect to correct and one changed in the opposite direction (exact McNemar $p=0.219$). Choice log loss decreased from 0.258 to 0.175 and binary Brier score from 0.054 to 0.022. Memory added 310 input tokens per call on average, while observed mean latency was unchanged at approximately 0.5 seconds. These results are directionally positive rather than clinically validating: the cases are synthetic, the labels are single-author judgments, and the memory is an oracle upper bound rather than extracted production output. The pilot supports evaluating structured clinical memory as a reusable state interface for decision models.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2611.04101 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2611.04101v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.04101 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 267 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
PRISM-BN: A Controlled Corpus and Benchmark for Text-to-Parameterized Bayesian Network Extraction
arXiv · 21 sept. 2026
SLP-ProbHard: Probabilistic Hard-Constrained Learning via Structural Latent Parameterization
arXiv · 30 sept. 2026
StruProKGR: A Structural and Probabilistic Framework for Sparse Knowledge Graph Reasoning
arXiv · 24 aug. 2026
Structured Inference with Large Language Gibbs
arXiv · 4 sept. 2026