analiza aiqbench
This research reveals a critical "representation-to-verbalization gap" in large language models, where capability requirements are linearly accessible within hidden states but fail to translate reliably into explicit natural language classifications. By demonstrating that fine-grained tool-use structures are decodable via linear probes across multiple open-weight architectures, the study offers a new diagnostic lens for understanding agent reasoning before generation occurs. This insight is vital for developers aiming to build more robust autonomous agents that can accurately infer and execute complex task requirements.
Structured but Silent: Probing Capability Requirements in LLM Hidden States
arXiv:2610.08018v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliable tool use requires more than triggering a mechanism or matching a query to an API description. Before selecting a specific tool, an agent must first infer the capability requirements implied by the user query. In this paper, we investigate whether these query-side capability requirements are linearly decodable from LLM hidden representations prior to generation, and how this hidden-state accessibility compares with explicit verbal classification. We introduce TACIT, a framework that decomposes external requirements along three fundamental axes: Source, Transformation, and World Effect, defining eight structurally distinct capability classes. Using 1,600 balanced training queries from benchmarks, synthetic examples, and new domain scenarios, we train linear probes on pre-generation hidden states from four open-weight LLM families. Our empirical results demonstrate that fine-grained capability structures are linearly decodable with high accuracy across all models. Crucially, however, we expose a representation-to-verbalization gap: these same models are significantly less reliable when asked to explicitly classify the same queries in natural language. This disconnect indicates that information about required external capabilities is linearly accessible in LLM hidden representations but not reliably expressed, a phenomenon we define as "structured but silent."
Abstract:Reliable tool use requires more than triggering a mechanism or matching a query to an API description. Before selecting a specific tool, an agent must first infer the capability requirements implied by the user query. In this paper, we investigate whether these query-side capability requirements are linearly decodable from LLM hidden representations prior to generation, and how this hidden-state accessibility compares with explicit verbal classification. We introduce TACIT, a framework that decomposes external requirements along three fundamental axes: Source, Transformation, and World Effect, defining eight structurally distinct capability classes. Using 1,600 balanced training queries from benchmarks, synthetic examples, and new domain scenarios, we train linear probes on pre-generation hidden states from four open-weight LLM families. Our empirical results demonstrate that fine-grained capability structures are linearly decodable with high accuracy across all models. Crucially, however, we expose a representation-to-verbalization gap: these same models are significantly less reliable when asked to explicitly classify the same queries in natural language. This disconnect indicates that information about required external capabilities is linearly accessible in LLM hidden representations but not reliably expressed, a phenomenon we define as "structured but silent."
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.08018 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.08018v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08018 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 280 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · 27 iul. 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · 23 sept. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 10 sept. 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · 5 oct. 2026