analiza aiqbench
This study introduces STRUCTURALCOST, a large-scale dataset designed to evaluate how well language models replicate human cognitive costs during sentence processing, specifically regarding long-distance dependencies. The findings reveal that while current architectures capture predictive elements of reading, they consistently underestimate the integration costs imposed by working memory limitations. This gap highlights a critical frontier for AI research: bridging the divide between statistical prediction and genuine cognitive plausibility in natural language understanding.
STRUCTURALCOST: A controlled reading time dataset for modeling human sentence processing difficulty
arXiv:2610.08208v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce STRUCTURALCOST, a self-paced reading dataset of 475 participants and 40,800 observations isolating the processing cost of long-distance subject-verb dependency resolution. We replicate a low-powered psycholinguistic finding at NLP scale, namely that human reading times at the main verb increase with dependency length, driven by syntactic embedding beyond linear distance. Different language models -- spanning n-gram models, SSMs, and transformers -- partially mirror this graded difficulty profile, yet underestimate the integration cost humans incur, with a gap that persists across architectures and model sizes. This suggests these models capture the predictive component of human processing but not the full integration cost that working memory imposes. STRUCTURALCOST provides data needed to drive progress toward evaluating the cognitive plausibility of language models.
Abstract:We introduce STRUCTURALCOST, a self-paced reading dataset of 475 participants and 40,800 observations isolating the processing cost of long-distance subject-verb dependency resolution. We replicate a low-powered psycholinguistic finding at NLP scale, namely that human reading times at the main verb increase with dependency length, driven by syntactic embedding beyond linear distance. Different language models -- spanning n-gram models, SSMs, and transformers -- partially mirror this graded difficulty profile, yet underestimate the integration cost humans incur, with a gap that persists across architectures and model sizes. This suggests these models capture the predictive component of human processing but not the full integration cost that working memory imposes. STRUCTURALCOST provides data needed to drive progress toward evaluating the cognitive plausibility of language models.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.08208 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.08208v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08208 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 219 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · 6 aug. 2026

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · 27 sept. 2026

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · 25 sept. 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · 3 aug. 2026