analiza aiqbench
StoSignSGD addresses critical divergence issues in SignSGD by introducing structural stochasticity, enabling stable training of large language models even under extreme low-precision regimes like FP4 where standard optimizers fail. The method achieves significant speedups and accuracy gains while theoretically matching convergence lower bounds for convex problems and improving complexity bounds for non-smooth non-convex tasks. This advancement offers a robust solution for distributed learning and foundation model training that maintains unbiased update steps despite the prevalence of non-smooth objectives in modern architectures.
StoSignSGD: Unbiased Structural Stochasticity Fixes SignSGD for Training Large Language Models
arXiv:2604.15416v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Sign-based optimization algorithms, such as SignSGD, have garnered attention for their performance in distributed learning and training large foundation models. Despite their empirical superiority, SignSGD is known to diverge on non-smooth objectives, which are ubiquitous due to ReLUs, max-pools, and mixture-of-experts. To overcome this limitation, we propose StoSignSGD, an algorithm that injects structural stochasticity into the sign operator while maintaining an unbiased update step. In the regime of (online) convex optimization, StoSignSGD rigorously resolves the non-convergence issues of SignSGD, achieving a sharp convergence rate matching the lower bound. For the more challenging non-convex non-smooth optimization, we introduce generalized stationary measures that encompass prior definitions, proving that StoSignSGD improves upon the best-known complexity bounds by dimensional factors. Empirically, StoSignSGD is stable and efficient across diverse large language model (LLM) training regimes. In aggressive low-precision pretraining, which spans both FP8 and the far more demanding FP4 regime where AdamW fails catastrophically, StoSignSGD stays stable and consistently performs the best. It attains a 1.44x to 2.14x speedup over established baselines under FP8. Under 4-bit precision, it improves downstream accuracy on the largest OLMo2-370M model by 1.13 points over the strongest stable baseline, and this advantage grows as both the model size and the data scale up. When fine-tuning 7B LLMs on mathematical reasoning tasks, StoSignSGD also delivers clear gains over both AdamW and SignSGD. Finally, to explain why it works, we develop a sign conversion framework that turns any general optimizer into its unbiased, sign-based counterpart. Using this framework, we decompose the core components of StoSignSGD and run a comprehensive ablation study to validate our design choices.
Abstract:Sign-based optimization algorithms, such as SignSGD, have garnered attention for their performance in distributed learning and training large foundation models. Despite their empirical superiority, SignSGD is known to diverge on non-smooth objectives, which are ubiquitous due to ReLUs, max-pools, and mixture-of-experts. To overcome this limitation, we propose StoSignSGD, an algorithm that injects structural stochasticity into the sign operator while maintaining an unbiased update step. In the regime of (online) convex optimization, StoSignSGD rigorously resolves the non-convergence issues of SignSGD, achieving a sharp convergence rate matching the lower bound. For the more challenging non-convex non-smooth optimization, we introduce generalized stationary measures that encompass prior definitions, proving that StoSignSGD improves upon the best-known complexity bounds by dimensional factors. Empirically, StoSignSGD is stable and efficient across diverse large language model (LLM) training regimes. In aggressive low-precision pretraining, which spans both FP8 and the far more demanding FP4 regime where AdamW fails catastrophically, StoSignSGD stays stable and consistently performs the best. It attains a 1.44x to 2.14x speedup over established baselines under FP8. Under 4-bit precision, it improves downstream accuracy on the largest OLMo2-370M model by 1.13 points over the strongest stable baseline, and this advantage grows as both the model size and the data scale up. When fine-tuning 7B LLMs on mathematical reasoning tasks, StoSignSGD also delivers clear gains over both AdamW and SignSGD. Finally, to explain why it works, we develop a sign conversion framework that turns any general optimizer into its unbiased, sign-based counterpart. Using this framework, we decompose the core components of StoSignSGD and run a comprehensive ablation study to validate our design choices.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2604.15416 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2604.15416v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.15416 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 363 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Deconfusing Corrigibility
AI Alignment Forum · 17 oct. 2026

Generalization and infinite width
LessWrong · 1 aug. 2026

Presentation: Designing AI Platforms for Reliability: Tools for Certainty, Agents for Discovery
InfoQ · 27 mai 2026

GEM Training: How Meta Doubled the Efficiency of Its LLM-Scale Ads Foundation Model
Meta Engineering · 3 aug. 2026