analiza aiqbench
StepFinder addresses the high latency and noise sensitivity of existing LLM-based failure attribution in multi-agent systems by offloading reasoning to lightweight temporal modeling. The framework achieves a 79% reduction in inference time compared to standard LLM methods while maintaining superior accuracy on the Who&When benchmark. This approach offers a practical path to improving system reliability without the computational overhead of text generation during the diagnostic phase.
StepFinder: A Temporal Semantic Framework for Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems
arXiv:2606.03467v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based multi-agent systems exhibit remarkable collaborative capabilities in complex multi-step tasks. However, these systems are highly sensitive to single-step execution errors that can propagate through agent interactions and lead to cascading failures. To understand the causes of failure and improve system reliability, failure attribution has been introduced as a task that aims to automatically identify the root cause step responsible for a failure. Existing failure attribution methods mainly rely on LLMs to reason over original execution trajectories, which not only incur high inference costs and latency, but also suffer from interference caused by redundant and noisy execution logs, causing LLMs to struggle in accurately identifying the true root cause step. To address this, we propose StepFinder, a lightweight failure attribution framework. We use LLMs solely during the feature construction phase to encode execution logs into temporal semantic sequences. Subsequently, a parameter-efficient combination of temporal modeling and attention modules is applied to capture the sequential evolution and cross-step dependencies of the trajectories. Finally, the step-level error score is refined through multi-scale differences and position bias, enabling precise root cause identification. Experimental results on the Who&When benchmark demonstrate that StepFinder outperforms LLM-based methods in step-level failure attribution while achieving substantially higher inference efficiency, reducing inference time by 79% compared with the fastest LLM-based method, with no text generation overhead. Our code is available at https://github.com/taiyu-zhu/StepFinder.
Abstract:LLM-based multi-agent systems exhibit remarkable collaborative capabilities in complex multi-step tasks. However, these systems are highly sensitive to single-step execution errors that can propagate through agent interactions and lead to cascading failures. To understand the causes of failure and improve system reliability, failure attribution has been introduced as a task that aims to automatically identify the root cause step responsible for a failure. Existing failure attribution methods mainly rely on LLMs to reason over original execution trajectories, which not only incur high inference costs and latency, but also suffer from interference caused by redundant and noisy execution logs, causing LLMs to struggle in accurately identifying the true root cause step. To address this, we propose StepFinder, a lightweight failure attribution framework. We use LLMs solely during the feature construction phase to encode execution logs into temporal semantic sequences. Subsequently, a parameter-efficient combination of temporal modeling and attention modules is applied to capture the sequential evolution and cross-step dependencies of the trajectories. Finally, the step-level error score is refined through multi-scale differences and position bias, enabling precise root cause identification. Experimental results on the Who&When benchmark demonstrate that StepFinder outperforms LLM-based methods in step-level failure attribution while achieving substantially higher inference efficiency, reducing inference time by 79% compared with the fastest LLM-based method, with no text generation overhead. Our code is available at this https URL.
12 pages, 5 figures. Accepted by KDD 2026
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2606.03467 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.03467v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.03467 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 327 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Automating coherent long-form video generation
Google Research · 24 sept. 2026

Intelligence is Free, Now What? <br> Data Systems for, of, and by Agents
BAIR Blog · 7 iul. 2026

Agent Evaluation Metric for multi-turn conversations
AWS · 10 sept. 2026

Presentation: Multi-Agent Patterns from Spotify’s AI Powered Advertising Platform
InfoQ · 8 oct. 2026