SpliceBind: Isoform-Aware Prediction of Binding Pocket Druggability

arXiv:2606.04020v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Splice-mediated drug resistance occurs in up to 40% of patients on targeted kinase inhibitors, yet state-of-the-art druggability tools operate on single structures and cannot compare across isoforms. We introduce SpliceBind, a graph neural network framework for isoform-aware druggability prediction. Beyond improving prediction accuracy (AUROC 0.703 vs. P2Rank 0.634, p = 0.026), we address a more fundamental question: when do structural methods succeed, and when must they fail? Systematic analysis of six clinically validated variants spanning five mechanism classes reveals a two-tier resistance taxonomy. Domain deletions (AR-V7, Delta = -18.39) and pocket disruptions produce structurally detectable changes, while allosteric mechanisms (BRAF-p61) remain fundamentally invisible to any pocket-centric approach -- a boundary no algorithmic improvement can cross. Notably, learned embeddings capture affinity-based resistance missed by geometry alone (ALK-L1196M: Delta_SB = -0.228 vs. Delta_P2Rank = -0.95), partially bridging the structural-biochemical gap. On 229 kinase pockets spanning 25 families, SpliceBind achieves AUROC 0.703 (p = 0.026 vs. P2Rank) with robust generalization to held-out families (AUROC 0.761). This taxonomy transforms clinical workflows: upon discovering a splice variant, clinicians can immediately determine whether computational triage suffices or biochemical validation is required -- reducing time from variant discovery to therapeutic decision.

Abstract:Splice-mediated drug resistance occurs in up to 40% of patients on targeted kinase inhibitors, yet state-of-the-art druggability tools operate on single structures and cannot compare across isoforms. We introduce SpliceBind, a graph neural network framework for isoform-aware druggability prediction. Beyond improving prediction accuracy (AUROC 0.703 vs. P2Rank 0.634, p = 0.026), we address a more fundamental question: when do structural methods succeed, and when must they fail? Systematic analysis of six clinically validated variants spanning five mechanism classes reveals a two-tier resistance taxonomy. Domain deletions (AR-V7, Delta = -18.39) and pocket disruptions produce structurally detectable changes, while allosteric mechanisms (BRAF-p61) remain fundamentally invisible to any pocket-centric approach -- a boundary no algorithmic improvement can cross. Notably, learned embeddings capture affinity-based resistance missed by geometry alone (ALK-L1196M: Delta_SB = -0.228 vs. Delta_P2Rank = -0.95), partially bridging the structural-biochemical gap. On 229 kinase pockets spanning 25 families, SpliceBind achieves AUROC 0.703 (p = 0.026 vs. P2Rank) with robust generalization to held-out families (AUROC 0.761). This taxonomy transforms clinical workflows: upon discovering a splice variant, clinicians can immediately determine whether computational triage suffices or biochemical validation is required -- reducing time from variant discovery to therapeutic decision.

Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2606.04020 [q-bio.QM]

(or arXiv:2606.04020v1 [q-bio.QM] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04020 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

analiza aiqbench

SpliceBind: Isoform-Aware Prediction of Binding Pocket Druggability

Subiecte conexe