SpatialUQ: Post-Hoc Uncertainty Quantification from Spatial Consistency in Black-Box Vision Models

arXiv:2610.09498v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Clinical vision models are often deployed as frozen black boxes with no access to internals, retraining, or ground truth at inference time. We introduce \textbf{SpatialUQ}, a post-hoc uncertainty method using only output probabilities. It measures the Jensen-Shannon divergence between the global prediction and the mean of five fixed spatial crops in six deterministic forward passes. The premise is simple, trustworthy predictions are spatially consistent. On NIH ChestX-ray14 (DenseNet-121, $N{=}25{,}596$), our Multicrop Uncertainty Score (MUS) reaches $0.784$ failure-detection AUC versus $0.664$ for MC-Dropout ($p{<}10^{-6}$) at one-fifth the compute, with native calibration ($\text{SCE}{=}0.049$ vs.\ $0.127$ for $\ell_1$), the best-calibrated among methods above 0.78 AUC. A supervised fusion of MUS with entropy, confidence, and $\ell_1$ reaches $0.832$, outperforming a five-member ensemble ($0.813$). MUS scales with model quality, reaching $0.899$ with BiomedCLIP ($\rho = 0.846$), while this relationship remains meaningful in-distribution ($\rho = 0.523$) but breaks down under severe distribution shift (VinBigData, $\rho = 0.027$). MUS is well-suited to diffuse findings but is less dependable for small focal lesions such as nodules. Code and experimental materials are publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/kawsher11/SpatialUQ.

Abstract:Clinical vision models are often deployed as frozen black boxes with no access to internals, retraining, or ground truth at inference time. We introduce \textbf{SpatialUQ}, a post-hoc uncertainty method using only output probabilities. It measures the Jensen-Shannon divergence between the global prediction and the mean of five fixed spatial crops in six deterministic forward passes. The premise is simple, trustworthy predictions are spatially consistent. On NIH ChestX-ray14 (DenseNet-121, $N{=}25{,}596$), our Multicrop Uncertainty Score (MUS) reaches $0.784$ failure-detection AUC versus $0.664$ for MC-Dropout ($p{<}10^{-6}$) at one-fifth the compute, with native calibration ($\text{SCE}{=}0.049$ vs.\ $0.127$ for $\ell_1$), the best-calibrated among methods above 0.78 AUC. A supervised fusion of MUS with entropy, confidence, and $\ell_1$ reaches $0.832$, outperforming a five-member ensemble ($0.813$). MUS scales with model quality, reaching $0.899$ with BiomedCLIP ($\rho = 0.846$), while this relationship remains meaningful in-distribution ($\rho = 0.523$) but breaks down under severe distribution shift (VinBigData, $\rho = 0.027$). MUS is well-suited to diffuse findings but is less dependable for small focal lesions such as nodules. Code and experimental materials are publicly available at this https URL.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.09498 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.09498v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.09498 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

analiza aiqbench

SpatialUQ: Post-Hoc Uncertainty Quantification from Spatial Consistency in Black-Box Vision Models

Subiecte conexe