Skeletal Prototypes on Iterative Nerve Expansions

arXiv:2609.16170v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prototype reduction replaces a training set with a smaller representation, and the established methods return a finite set of points. We propose Skeletal Prototypes on Iterative Nerve Expansions (SPINE). The model for each class is an embedded 1-complex rather than a point set. Its initial edge set is a class-conditional Mapper graph, so the data decide which localized clusters are joined. Later phases fit the vertices under a classification objective, and an observation is assigned to the class whose complex is nearest. The segments therefore enter the decision rule and not only the fitting. We evaluate SPINE on seventeen benchmark datasets under stratified 10-fold cross validation, against seven other prototype reduction methods at a matched budget. SPINE attains the highest mean accuracy and the best average rank. It is significantly better than five of the seven competitors under Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm correction. A budget sweep shows that the decision rule using the entire graph segments contribute most when prototypes are scarce, while the method as a whole competes best at moderate budgets. Construction cost places SPINE with the discriminative methods, and it is faster than generalized learning vector quantization on fourteen of the seventeen datasets.

Abstract:Prototype reduction replaces a training set with a smaller representation, and the established methods return a finite set of points. We propose Skeletal Prototypes on Iterative Nerve Expansions (SPINE). The model for each class is an embedded 1-complex rather than a point set. Its initial edge set is a class-conditional Mapper graph, so the data decide which localized clusters are joined. Later phases fit the vertices under a classification objective, and an observation is assigned to the class whose complex is nearest. The segments therefore enter the decision rule and not only the fitting. We evaluate SPINE on seventeen benchmark datasets under stratified 10-fold cross validation, against seven other prototype reduction methods at a matched budget. SPINE attains the highest mean accuracy and the best average rank. It is significantly better than five of the seven competitors under Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm correction. A budget sweep shows that the decision rule using the entire graph segments contribute most when prototypes are scarce, while the method as a whole competes best at moderate budgets. Construction cost places SPINE with the discriminative methods, and it is faster than generalized learning vector quantization on fourteen of the seventeen datasets.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2609.16170 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.16170v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16170 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

analiza aiqbench

Skeletal Prototypes on Iterative Nerve Expansions

Subiecte conexe