analiza aiqbench
This paper investigates the computational distinction between human demonstrators intentionally teaching versus merely performing tasks, proposing a Bayesian model to capture these nuances. The study demonstrates that standard inverse reinforcement learning algorithms achieve better performance when trained on data generated by intentional teaching behaviors rather than simple demonstrations. This work advances our understanding of how machines can more effectively learn from human guidance in interactive settings.
Showing versus Doing: Teaching by Demonstration
arXiv:2610.14004v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: People often learn from others' demonstrations, and inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) techniques have realized this capacity in machines. In contrast, teaching by demonstration has been less well studied computationally. Here, we develop a Bayesian model for teaching by demonstration. Stark differences arise when demonstrators are intentionally teaching (i.e. showing) a task versus simply performing (i.e. doing) a task. In two experiments, we show that human participants modify their teaching behavior consistent with the predictions of our model. Further, we show that even standard IRL algorithms benefit when learning from showing versus doing.
Abstract:People often learn from others' demonstrations, and inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) techniques have realized this capacity in machines. In contrast, teaching by demonstration has been less well studied computationally. Here, we develop a Bayesian model for teaching by demonstration. Stark differences arise when demonstrators are intentionally teaching (i.e. showing) a task versus simply performing (i.e. doing) a task. In two experiments, we show that human participants modify their teaching behavior consistent with the predictions of our model. Further, we show that even standard IRL algorithms benefit when learning from showing versus doing.
Published at NeurIPS 2016 (oral presentation). 12 pages, including supplementary materials
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
arXiv:2610.14004 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.14004v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14004 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 203 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026
Inoculation Adapters Improve Upon Inoculation Prompting
LessWrong · 17 iul. 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · 12 oct. 2026
Alignement pretraining could backfire
LessWrong · 17 iun. 2026