analiza aiqbench
This paper introduces SRCoT, a modular architecture for edge LLMs that implements a closed-loop Retrieve-Reflect-Revise pipeline to enhance traceability and local execution. Rather than claiming superior accuracy or safety, the study demonstrates an inspectable control procedure using synthetic emergency scenarios on Apple M4 hardware, highlighting remaining challenges like provenance errors and unsafe assumptions. The primary contribution lies in separating retrieval and control from the model interface to enable report-level inspectability without comparative superiority claims.
Self-Reflective Chain-of-Thought (SRCoT): Evidence-Based Text Generation via a Closed-Loop Retrieve--Reflect--Revise Pipeline on Edge LLMs
arXiv:2610.23311v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can generate fluent outputs that lack source support or conflict with local operational constraints. We introduce Self-Reflective Chain-of-Thought (SRCoT), a modular architecture that organizes generation as a closed Retrieve--Reflect--Revise loop. SRCoT separates environment state, persistent knowledge, accumulated experience, and short-term memory into provenance-labeled stores. BM25 retrieval supplies local context; subsequent passes expose intermediate drafts, missing-information markers, follow-up queries, and optional claim--evidence mappings. These artifacts inform retrieval, revision, clarification, or abstention decisions. We examine the architecture through qualitative, trace-based case studies in two fully synthetic settings: emergency medical services and Munich-Sim, an emergency-operations simulation. Local prototype runs on an Apple M4-family laptop with 128 GB memory illustrate source-labeled documentation, explicit gap marking, and structured dispatch-style outputs. The traces also reveal provenance-assignment errors, incomplete evidence coverage, and unsafe assumptions that remain possible despite prompting constraints. These cases demonstrate report-level inspectability and local execution, not comparative superiority, hallucination reduction, clinical validity, or operational safety. The architecture separates retrieval and control from the model interface, but behavior across different models remains to be evaluated. SRCoT is a research proof of concept requiring human review, with its principal contribution lying in an inspectable control procedure rather than a new model.
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) can generate fluent outputs that lack source support or conflict with local operational constraints. We introduce Self-Reflective Chain-of-Thought (SRCoT), a modular architecture that organizes generation as a closed Retrieve--Reflect--Revise loop. SRCoT separates environment state, persistent knowledge, accumulated experience, and short-term memory into provenance-labeled stores. BM25 retrieval supplies local context; subsequent passes expose intermediate drafts, missing-information markers, follow-up queries, and optional claim--evidence mappings. These artifacts inform retrieval, revision, clarification, or abstention decisions. We examine the architecture through qualitative, trace-based case studies in two fully synthetic settings: emergency medical services and Munich-Sim, an emergency-operations simulation. Local prototype runs on an Apple M4-family laptop with 128 GB memory illustrate source-labeled documentation, explicit gap marking, and structured dispatch-style outputs. The traces also reveal provenance-assignment errors, incomplete evidence coverage, and unsafe assumptions that remain possible despite prompting constraints. These cases demonstrate report-level inspectability and local execution, not comparative superiority, hallucination reduction, clinical validity, or operational safety. The architecture separates retrieval and control from the model interface, but behavior across different models remains to be evaluated. SRCoT is a research proof of concept requiring human review, with its principal contribution lying in an inspectable control procedure rather than a new model.
28 pages, 2 figures. Extended technical account; a related brief report based on overlapping work has been submitted to Frontiers in Disaster and Emergency Medicine. The two manuscripts do not represent independent empirical studies
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.23311 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.23311v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.23311 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 255 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026
Construct validity of Claude Opus 4.8's System Card – A commentary
LessWrong · 12 iun. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 18 sept. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026