analiza aiqbench
This research introduces SPRO, a novel framework for Process Reinforcement Learning that eliminates the computational overhead of external reward models by deriving rewards intrinsically from the policy. By redefining step-wise advantage through Cumulative Process Rewards and Masked Step Advantage, it achieves significant efficiency gains while preventing reward hacking in Large Language Models. The method offers a practical path toward scaling process-aware RL without additional infrastructure costs, directly addressing key bottlenecks in current training pipelines.
Self-Guided Process Reward Optimization with Redefined Step-wise Advantage for Process Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2507.01551v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Process Reinforcement Learning~(PRL) has demonstrated considerable potential in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models~(LLMs). However, introducing additional process reward models incurs substantial computational overhead, and there is no unified theoretical framework for process-level advantage estimation. To bridge this gap, we propose \textbf{S}elf-Guided \textbf{P}rocess \textbf{R}eward \textbf{O}ptimization~(\textbf{SPRO}), a novel framework that enables process-aware RL through two key innovations: (1) we show that process rewards can be derived intrinsically from the policy model itself, and (2) we redefine step-wise advantage by introducing well-defined Cumulative Process Rewards~(\textbf{CPR}) and \textbf{M}asked \textbf{S}tep \textbf{A}dvantage~(\textbf{MSA}), which facilitates rigorous step-wise action advantage estimation within shared-prompt sampling groups. Our experimental results show that SPRO outperforms vanilla GRPO with 3.4x higher training efficiency and a 12.9\% test accuracy improvement. Furthermore, SPRO maintains a stable and elevated policy entropy throughout training while achieving a considerable reduction in response length, evidencing sufficient exploration and prevention of reward hacking. Notably, SPRO incurs no additional computational overhead compared to outcome-supervised RL methods such as GRPO, which benefit industrial implementation.
Abstract:Process Reinforcement Learning~(PRL) has demonstrated considerable potential in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models~(LLMs). However, introducing additional process reward models incurs substantial computational overhead, and there is no unified theoretical framework for process-level advantage estimation. To bridge this gap, we propose \textbf{S}elf-Guided \textbf{P}rocess \textbf{R}eward \textbf{O}ptimization~(\textbf{SPRO}), a novel framework that enables process-aware RL through two key innovations: (1) we show that process rewards can be derived intrinsically from the policy model itself, and (2) we redefine step-wise advantage by introducing well-defined Cumulative Process Rewards~(\textbf{CPR}) and \textbf{M}asked \textbf{S}tep \textbf{A}dvantage~(\textbf{MSA}), which facilitates rigorous step-wise action advantage estimation within shared-prompt sampling groups. Our experimental results show that SPRO outperforms vanilla GRPO with 3.4x higher training efficiency and a 12.9\% test accuracy improvement. Furthermore, SPRO maintains a stable and elevated policy entropy throughout training while achieving a considerable reduction in response length, evidencing sufficient exploration and prevention of reward hacking. Notably, SPRO incurs no additional computational overhead compared to outcome-supervised RL methods such as GRPO, which benefit industrial implementation.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2507.01551 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2507.01551v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 184 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · 14 sept. 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · 12 iun. 2026
Problems of Proliferation
LessWrong · 29 sept. 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026