analiza aiqbench
This paper demonstrates that self-conditioning in flow matching transforms iterative sampling into a mechanism for deep sequential reasoning, effectively bypassing the constant-depth limitations of standard transformer backbones. By carrying information between steps, the method achieves expressive power equivalent to space-bounded Turing machines, offering a theoretical foundation for scaling visual reasoning capabilities. This work provides a critical design principle for leveraging generative models in complex problem-solving tasks beyond simple image synthesis.
Self-Conditioning Enables Deep Sequential Reasoning in Flow Matching
arXiv:2610.19628v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent work has explored visual reasoning through image generation, where models solve visual-reasoning problems by directly generating solution images. Intuitively, iterative samplers such as flow matching are well suited to this task, since each sampling step may resemble one reasoning step. However, in this work, from a circuit complexity perspective, we show that this intuition is misleading. We prove that as long as the model outputs satisfy certain mild regularity conditions, the trajectory of the vanilla flow-matching sampler can be simulated by a constant number of sequential rounds of parallel model evaluations. Consequently, additional sampling steps cannot increase the expressive power of a constant-depth backbone model under the standard complexity-theoretic model of transformers. We then reveal that self-conditioning, which conditions the model on the previous step's estimate of the final image, plays a previously unrecognized role in removing this bottleneck. Controlled experiments on diverse visual-reasoning tasks show that flow matching with self-conditioning achieves higher accuracy and greater reasoning depth than vanilla flow matching, and its performance improves with more sampling steps. Theoretically, we prove that with self-conditioning, a constant-depth backbone can achieve expressive power equivalent to that of space-bounded Turing machines. Our study suggests a design principle for future visual reasoning research: carry more information between sampling steps, so that additional steps translate into deeper reasoning.
Abstract:Recent work has explored visual reasoning through image generation, where models solve visual-reasoning problems by directly generating solution images. Intuitively, iterative samplers such as flow matching are well suited to this task, since each sampling step may resemble one reasoning step. However, in this work, from a circuit complexity perspective, we show that this intuition is misleading. We prove that as long as the model outputs satisfy certain mild regularity conditions, the trajectory of the vanilla flow-matching sampler can be simulated by a constant number of sequential rounds of parallel model evaluations. Consequently, additional sampling steps cannot increase the expressive power of a constant-depth backbone model under the standard complexity-theoretic model of transformers. We then reveal that self-conditioning, which conditions the model on the previous step's estimate of the final image, plays a previously unrecognized role in removing this bottleneck. Controlled experiments on diverse visual-reasoning tasks show that flow matching with self-conditioning achieves higher accuracy and greater reasoning depth than vanilla flow matching, and its performance improves with more sampling steps. Theoretically, we prove that with self-conditioning, a constant-depth backbone can achieve expressive power equivalent to that of space-bounded Turing machines. Our study suggests a design principle for future visual reasoning research: carry more information between sampling steps, so that additional steps translate into deeper reasoning.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.19628 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2610.19628v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19628 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 316 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · 12 oct. 2026

Implementing and Evaluating a Basic Per-Action Monitor for Safer Evals
METR · 27 sept. 2026
The current bottleneck is political will, not research
AI Alignment Forum · 11 iul. 2026

Graph-centric agentic intelligence
Amazon Science · 1 oct. 2026