Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchProduse AI

analiza aiqbench

This research introduces a closed-loop framework for language-guided object retrieval that dynamically balances information gathering with selective grasp commitment under partial observability. By integrating view-conditioned vision-language model observations with belief-space planning, the system effectively manages uncertainty to achieve higher success rates in simulation and demonstrates autonomous recovery from grasp failures on real robots. While cross-view memory aids performance under occlusion, ablation studies suggest that complex full-system variants do not always outperform simplified approaches in every scenario.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Selective Commitment for Language-Guided Object Retrieval under Partial Observability

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.23131v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language-guided object retrieval under partial observability requires deciding whether to gather more evidence, interact with the scene, grasp a candidate, or abstain. We present a closed-loop framework that coordinates these decisions for retrieving a target specified in relation to a reference container. The framework maintains a persistent joint belief over target identity, container relation, and presence through tracked-object, unobserved-target, and target-absent hypotheses. View-conditioned categorical VLM observations update this belief; conformal grasp eligibility and robot feasibility govern commitment, while finite-horizon belief-space planning selects information-gathering actions. Across five different scenarios, our proposed method succeeds in 19/25 simulation episodes versus 12/25 for the best-performing task-adapted baseline and is the only evaluated policy to achieve at least one success in each scenario. Ablations show that cross-view memory improves success under partial occlusion, while the full system does not consistently outperform simplified variants. Real-robot trials demonstrate closed-loop re-observation and autonomous recovery from injected grasp failures, while injected viewpoint failures end in false defer. Experimental results demonstrate the feasibility of coordinating evidence gathering and selective grasp commitment within a unified framework for retrieval under partial observability.

Abstract:Language-guided object retrieval under partial observability requires deciding whether to gather more evidence, interact with the scene, grasp a candidate, or abstain. We present a closed-loop framework that coordinates these decisions for retrieving a target specified in relation to a reference container. The framework maintains a persistent joint belief over target identity, container relation, and presence through tracked-object, unobserved-target, and target-absent hypotheses. View-conditioned categorical VLM observations update this belief; conformal grasp eligibility and robot feasibility govern commitment, while finite-horizon belief-space planning selects information-gathering actions. Across five different scenarios, our proposed method succeeds in 19/25 simulation episodes versus 12/25 for the best-performing task-adapted baseline and is the only evaluated policy to achieve at least one success in each scenario. Ablations show that cross-view memory improves success under partial occlusion, while the full system does not consistently outperform simplified variants. Real-robot trials demonstrate closed-loop re-observation and autonomous recovery from injected grasp failures, while injected viewpoint failures end in false defer. Experimental results demonstrate the feasibility of coordinating evidence gathering and selective grasp commitment within a unified framework for retrieval under partial observability.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.23131 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.23131v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.23131 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 273 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe