analiza aiqbench
SecProbe introduces an adaptive evaluation framework using Item Response Theory to efficiently assess coding agents' ability to recognize and repair cybersecurity vulnerabilities. By dynamically synthesizing tasks based on model performance, the system identifies significant capability gaps in frontier AI models while reducing the number of required test cases. This approach offers a scalable method for benchmarking safety-critical AI capabilities as they evolve.
SecProbe: Adaptive Evaluation of Coding Agents on Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities
arXiv:2609.33763v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Assessing cybersecurity vulnerability awareness in coding agents requires evaluations that reveal capability gaps and remain informative as models evolve. Static benchmarks offer fixed coverage and difficulty, while scarce vulnerable repositories and costly expert authoring limit their renewal at scale. We introduce SecProbe, a framework for adaptive evaluation that combines Item Response Theory (IRT) with on-demand synthesis of repository-scale vulnerability-repair tasks. From observed performance, \textsc{SecProbe} estimates agent ability and identifies where additional evidence is most informative, selecting existing tasks or synthesizing new ones accordingly. As one use case, we construct 353 tasks spanning six programming languages and 151 CWE types and evaluate nine frontier models with two agent harnesses. Success rates peak at 28.33\%, highlighting substantial gaps in vulnerability recognition and repair. Compared with random and one-shot baselines, \textsc{SecProbe} achieves comparable agent ability estimates while requiring agents to solve up to 29.5\% fewer tasks. These results support adaptive evaluation as an efficient and discriminative approach to assessing cybersecurity vulnerability awareness.
Abstract:Assessing cybersecurity vulnerability awareness in coding agents requires evaluations that reveal capability gaps and remain informative as models evolve. Static benchmarks offer fixed coverage and difficulty, while scarce vulnerable repositories and costly expert authoring limit their renewal at scale. We introduce SecProbe, a framework for adaptive evaluation that combines Item Response Theory (IRT) with on-demand synthesis of repository-scale vulnerability-repair tasks. From observed performance, \textsc{SecProbe} estimates agent ability and identifies where additional evidence is most informative, selecting existing tasks or synthesizing new ones accordingly. As one use case, we construct 353 tasks spanning six programming languages and 151 CWE types and evaluate nine frontier models with two agent harnesses. Success rates peak at 28.33\%, highlighting substantial gaps in vulnerability recognition and repair. Compared with random and one-shot baselines, \textsc{SecProbe} achieves comparable agent ability estimates while requiring agents to solve up to 29.5\% fewer tasks. These results support adaptive evaluation as an efficient and discriminative approach to assessing cybersecurity vulnerability awareness.
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.33763 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2609.33763v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.33763 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 257 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Introducing Claude Opus 5
Anthropic · 24 iul. 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026

AI Leaders Propose SAFE Guidelines for Cybersecurity Transparency
NVIDIA · 4 aug. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 10 sept. 2026