analiza aiqbench
Deep research agents currently face a significant evaluation fragility known as Search-Time Contamination, where web searches inadvertently leak benchmark answers and inflate performance metrics by up to 4%. This study identifies three specific leakage vectors—metadata, context, and explicit answers—and proposes mitigation strategies like isolated sandboxes and controlled access to ensure reported reasoning capabilities reflect true agent ability rather than data retrieval.
Search-Time Contamination in Deep Research Agents: Measuring Performance Inflation in Public Benchmark Evaluation
arXiv:2606.05241v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Public benchmarks enable fair and reproducible evaluation of LLM reasoning, but they become fragile for deep research agents that actively search the web during inference. Such agents may retrieve public benchmark metadata, question context, or even ground-truth answers via web search. This gives rise to Search-Time Contamination (STC), where external retrieval bypasses intended reasoning and inflates measured performance. We systematically study STC in deep research agent evaluation. We define three contamination types with increasing severity, namely Benchmark Metadata Leakage, Question-Context Leakage, and Explicit Answer Leakage, and develop detection algorithms to identify them and quantify their impact on agent performance. Evaluating modern deep research agents on six public benchmarks, we find that STC is widespread and can inflate performance by up to 4%. Our findings show that existing evaluations may overestimate true reasoning ability. We therefore advocate contamination-aware practices, including isolated sandboxes, transparent search trajectories, and controlled benchmark access.
Abstract:Public benchmarks enable fair and reproducible evaluation of LLM reasoning, but they become fragile for deep research agents that actively search the web during inference. Such agents may retrieve public benchmark metadata, question context, or even ground-truth answers via web search. This gives rise to Search-Time Contamination (STC), where external retrieval bypasses intended reasoning and inflates measured performance. We systematically study STC in deep research agent evaluation. We define three contamination types with increasing severity, namely Benchmark Metadata Leakage, Question-Context Leakage, and Explicit Answer Leakage, and develop detection algorithms to identify them and quantify their impact on agent performance. Evaluating modern deep research agents on six public benchmarks, we find that STC is widespread and can inflate performance by up to 4%. Our findings show that existing evaluations may overestimate true reasoning ability. We therefore advocate contamination-aware practices, including isolated sandboxes, transparent search trajectories, and controlled benchmark access.
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2606.05241 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2606.05241v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05241 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 244 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · 8 oct. 2026
Towards embedded evaluations for scheming propensities
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · 14 sept. 2026

Presentation: Building Evals for AI Adoption: from Principles to Practice
InfoQ · 29 mai 2026