Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This paper presents a protocol for an AI agent system in panvascular intervention research, but its experiments audit only one fixed component: a segmentation model paired with a heuristic abstention gate, evaluated on public ARCADE data. The reported results, including a stenosis Dice of 0.231 and a gate that rejects 55.7% of reference candidates, show that support and abstention can be measured, while the authors state that recursive improvement and clinical validity were not tested. Readers should treat acceptance by the gate as a measurable behavior, not as evidence of correctness or safety.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

ScienceBuddy-PV: A Verifier-Governed Recursive Improvement Protocol for Panvascular Intervention Research

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.14523v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: ScienceBuddy-PV adapts the ScienceBuddy recursive-in-recursive design to panvascular intervention research through a structured evidence ledger, device-vessel ontology, abstention contract and retained failure bank. Recursive harness optimization and outer-loop model learning, including reinforcement learning, are specified but not executed. We audit a fixed component, rather than the complete agent system, using separate ARCADE syntax and stenosis tasks (1,000 training, 200 validation and 300 test images per task). A shared task-masked convolutional model was trained once per representation setting; its parameters and the heuristic support gate were then held fixed, with the stenosis threshold selected on validation data. On the locked test sets, syntax Dice was 0.475 (95% CI 0.459-0.490) and stenosis Dice was 0.231 (95% CI 0.214-0.249). Stenosis pixel AUROC was 0.957 and AUPRC was 0.180 at prevalence 0.00975. The gate accepted 76.7% of stenosis-frame outputs versus 100% for a score-only comparator. In a constructed mask audit, it accepted 44.3% of reference candidates and rejected 55.7%, exposing the cost of abstention. Acceptance does not establish correctness or clinical safety. This public-data component audit makes support and abstention measurable and provides a reproducible protocol for future collaborative agent studies. It does not demonstrate recursive improvement, patient-level validity or clinical device recommendations.

Abstract:ScienceBuddy-PV adapts the ScienceBuddy recursive-in-recursive design to panvascular intervention research through a structured evidence ledger, device-vessel ontology, abstention contract and retained failure bank. Recursive harness optimization and outer-loop model learning, including reinforcement learning, are specified but not executed. We audit a fixed component, rather than the complete agent system, using separate ARCADE syntax and stenosis tasks (1,000 training, 200 validation and 300 test images per task). A shared task-masked convolutional model was trained once per representation setting; its parameters and the heuristic support gate were then held fixed, with the stenosis threshold selected on validation data. On the locked test sets, syntax Dice was 0.475 (95% CI 0.459-0.490) and stenosis Dice was 0.231 (95% CI 0.214-0.249). Stenosis pixel AUROC was 0.957 and AUPRC was 0.180 at prevalence 0.00975. The gate accepted 76.7% of stenosis-frame outputs versus 100% for a score-only comparator. In a constructed mask audit, it accepted 44.3% of reference candidates and rejected 55.7%, exposing the cost of abstention. Acceptance does not establish correctness or clinical safety. This public-data component audit makes support and abstention measurable and provides a reproducible protocol for future collaborative agent studies. It does not demonstrate recursive improvement, patient-level validity or clinical device recommendations.

17 pages, 17 figures, 19 references. Public-data component audit; recursive improvement is specified as a protocol and not experimentally demonstrated

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

arXiv:2610.14523 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.14523v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14523 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 243 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe