analiza aiqbench
ScienceArena addresses the critical issue of benchmark saturation by introducing rigorous, expert-audited olympiad problems in physics, chemistry, and biology to test genuine scientific reasoning in frontier LLMs. The study reveals that while top models achieve medal-equivalent scores on several exams, persistent bottlenecks remain in chemistry domains and maintaining consistency over long problem horizons. This work provides a necessary new evaluation framework to distinguish between memorized patterns and authentic multi-step scientific problem-solving capabilities.
ScienceArena: Benchmarking LLMs on Latest Scientific Olympiad Competitions
arXiv:2608.30517v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmark saturation and data contamination increasingly obscure genuine scientific reasoning in frontier LLMs. We introduce \textsc{ScienceArena}, an olympiad-style benchmark from thirteen public science competitions in physics, chemistry, and biology, including IPhO and IChO 2025--2026, IBO 2023, USAPhO 2026, and USNCO 2025. Its open-ended, multi-step problems use process-credit rubrics, making faithful scoring difficult. We build ScienceArena through an expert-audited digitization pipeline that converts official exams, figures, solutions, and rubrics into structured items verified by olympiad medalists. To scale evaluation beyond costly human grading, we calibrate LLM-as-judge against medalist ground truth on archived answers from five models across IPhO and IChO; two strong judges stay within one point of expert total scores. Medalist notes show that failures often stem from visual grounding, structure fidelity, and global problem control rather than missing terminology. Evaluating fourteen recent LLMs with interleaved solving, we find that top models obtain medal-equivalent rubric scores on several public international exams, while chemistry and long-horizon consistency remain key bottlenecks. We provide an interactive \href{https://science-arena.onrender.com/}{demo}.
Abstract:Benchmark saturation and data contamination increasingly obscure genuine scientific reasoning in frontier LLMs. We introduce \textsc{ScienceArena}, an olympiad-style benchmark from thirteen public science competitions in physics, chemistry, and biology, including IPhO and IChO 2025--2026, IBO 2023, USAPhO 2026, and USNCO 2025. Its open-ended, multi-step problems use process-credit rubrics, making faithful scoring difficult. We build ScienceArena through an expert-audited digitization pipeline that converts official exams, figures, solutions, and rubrics into structured items verified by olympiad medalists. To scale evaluation beyond costly human grading, we calibrate LLM-as-judge against medalist ground truth on archived answers from five models across IPhO and IChO; two strong judges stay within one point of expert total scores. Medalist notes show that failures often stem from visual grounding, structure fidelity, and global problem control rather than missing terminology. Evaluating fourteen recent LLMs with interleaved solving, we find that top models obtain medal-equivalent rubric scores on several public international exams, while chemistry and long-horizon consistency remain key bottlenecks. We provide an interactive \href{this https URL}{demo}.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2608.30517 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.30517v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30517 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 264 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026

A New Era of Discovery: Google Research at I/O 2026
Google Research · 28 mai 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026