analiza aiqbench
This article investigates scaling Categorical Flow Maps (CFMs) for language modeling, demonstrating that flow matching can effectively handle discrete tokens at scale with accelerated sampling in as few as four steps. By training a 1.7B-parameter model on over 2 trillion tokens and introducing new likelihood bounds, the study validates CFMs against autoregressive baselines while addressing specific challenges like loss weighting and time scheduling for large-scale deployment.
Scaling Categorical Flow Maps

Continuous diffusion and flow matching models could represent a powerful alternative to autoregressive approaches for language modelling (LM), as they unlock a host of advantages currently reserved for continuous modalities, including accelerated sampling and tilting. Recently, several works have demonstrated the possibility of generating discrete data continuously by a simple flow matching process between a Gaussian and the one-hot encoded data distribution. They have further shown the feasibility of accelerated sampling via Categorical Flow Maps (CFMs), resulting in competitive sample…
Continuous diffusion and flow matching models could represent a powerful alternative to autoregressive approaches for language modelling (LM), as they unlock a host of advantages currently reserved for continuous modalities, including accelerated sampling and tilting. Recently, several works have demonstrated the possibility of generating discrete data continuously by a simple flow matching process between a Gaussian and the one-hot encoded data distribution. They have further shown the feasibility of accelerated sampling via Categorical Flow Maps (CFMs), resulting in competitive sample quality in the few-step regime. However, this method had only been evaluated at relatively modest scales (< 1B), leaving the question of its scalability completely open. In this article, we train a 1.7B-parameter base flow model on 2.1T tokens and self-distill it into a CFM that generates diverse, high-quality text in as few as 4 inference steps while maintaining near-data-level token entropy. Furthermore, we introduce a likelihood bound for CFMs in the semi-discrete setting, and show that they can be used to score the model on standard LM benchmarks, achieving results in the same range as discrete diffusion methods. Finally, we uncover some of the challenges that arise from training these models at scale, and we provide prescriptive insights on loss weighting and time scheduling.
Related readings and updates.
Diffusion models achieve high-quality image generation but are limited by slow iterative sampling. Distillation methods alleviate this by enabling one- or few-step generation. Flow matching, originally introduced as a distinct framework, has since been shown to be theoretically equivalent to diffusion under Gaussian assumptions, raising the question of whether distillation techniques such as score distillation transfer directly. We provide a…
Conditional generative modeling aims to learn a conditional data distribution from samples containing data-condition pairs. For this, diffusion and flow-based methods have attained compelling results. These methods use a learned (flow) model to transport an initial standard Gaussian noise that ignores the condition to the conditional data distribution. The model is hence required to learn both mass transport and conditional injection. To ease the…
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 333 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Assessing Information Ecosystems : How Governments Can Get Ahead of Hybrid Threats
carnegieendowment.org · 5 aug. 2026

Modernizing and scaling support operations with generative AI on AWS
AWS · 2 sept. 2026

Advancing AI Infrastructure for Agentic AI with NVIDIA DOCA In-Silicon Security
NVIDIA · 1 iun. 2026
Salesforce after Dreamforce: How the CRM giant can grow beyond its own interface
SiliconANGLE · 19 sept. 2026